Skip to content

jose-swift has JWT Signature Verification Bypass via None Algorithm

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jan 9, 2026 in beatt83/jose-swift

Package

swift github.com/beatt83/jose-swift (Swift)

Affected versions

<= 6.0.1

Patched versions

None

Description

Summary

An authentication bypass vulnerability allows any unauthenticated attacker to forge arbitrary JWT tokens by setting "alg": "none" in the token header. The library's verification functions immediately return true for such tokens without performing any cryptographic verification, enabling complete impersonation of any user and privilege escalation.

Details

The vulnerability exists in Sources/JSONWebSignature/JWS+Verify.swift at lines 34-37:

  public func verify<Key>(key: Key?) throws -> Bool {
      guard SigningAlgorithm.none != protectedHeader.algorithm else {
          return true  // <-- Vulnerability: returns true without verification
      }

When the JWT header contains "alg": "none", the verify() method returns true immediately without:

  1. Checking if the signature is empty or present
  2. Validating the token against any key
  3. Requiring explicit opt-in from the caller

The SigningAlgorithm enum in Sources/JSONWebAlgorithms/Signatures/SigningAlgorithm.swift:72 explicitly includes case none = "none" as a valid algorithm.

All verification methods are affected:

  • JWS.verify(key:) - Instance method
  • JWS.verify(jwsString:payload:key:) - Static method
  • JWT.verify(jwtString:senderKey:) - High-level API

PoC

  1. Create a forged JWT with modified claims:
    // Forged header with alg:none
    let header = #"{"alg":"none","typ":"JWT"}"#

// Attacker's payload with escalated privileges
let payload = #"{"sub":"user123","admin":true}"#

// Base64URL encode and concatenate with empty signature
let forgedToken = base64url(header) + "." + base64url(payload) + "."
// Result: eyJhbGciOiJub25lIiwidHlwIjoiSldUIn0.eyJzdWIiOiJ1c2VyMTIzIiwiYWRtaW4iOnRydWV9.

  1. Verify the forged token passes verification:
    let jws = try JWS(jwsString: forgedToken)
    let isValid = try jws.verify(key: legitimateSecretKey) // Returns TRUE

Impact

This is an authentication bypass vulnerability. Who is impacted: Any application using jose-swift for JWT verification is vulnerable. An attacker can:

  • Forge identity: Create tokens claiming to be any user
  • Escalate privileges: Add admin/superuser claims to gain unauthorized access
  • Bypass authentication entirely: Access protected resources without valid credentials
  • Modify any claim: Change expiration, audience, issuer, or any custom claims

The attack requires no knowledge of the signing key and works against all signature algorithms (HS256, RS256, ES256, etc.) since the attacker simply bypasses signature verification entirely.

Credits

Reported by Louis Nyffenegger - https://pentesterlab.com/

References

@beatt83 beatt83 published to beatt83/jose-swift Jan 9, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jan 9, 2026
Reviewed Jan 9, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

The product uses a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm or protocol. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-88q6-jcjg-hvmw

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.