Skip to content

Better Auth: Device authorization approve and deny accept any authenticated session while the user code is pending

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 31, 2026 in better-auth/better-auth • Updated Jun 4, 2026

Package

npm better-auth (npm)

Affected versions

>= 1.6.0, < 1.6.11

Patched versions

1.6.11

Description

Am I affected?

You are affected if all of the following are true:

  • You use better-auth at a version >= 1.6.0, < 1.6.11.
  • The deviceAuthorization plugin is enabled in your auth config (deviceAuthorization() in your plugins array).
  • A third party can observe a pending user code before the legitimate user completes verification.

The standard device-flow UX displays user codes to humans, so realistic exposure includes shoulder-surfing, screen-share, voice or video calls, support-chat transcripts, referrer headers, and shared logs.

If your application does not enable the deviceAuthorization plugin, you are not affected.

Fix:

  1. Upgrade to better-auth@1.6.11 or later.
  2. If you cannot upgrade, see workarounds below.

Summary

Better Auth's deviceAuthorization plugin treated any authenticated session as the owner of any pending device code. The ownership gate on POST /device/approve and POST /device/deny short-circuited whenever the row's userId was unset, and the GET /device verification handler did not claim the row. An authenticated attacker who learned a valid user_code before the legitimate user completed approval could bind the polling device to the attacker's account or deny the legitimate flow.

Details

The device authorization flow binds the polling device to the user who entered the user code on the verification page. In affected versions, the plugin only created that binding at approve or deny time, with no claim at the verification step. The ownership check at approve and deny short-circuited when the owner was missing, accepting any authenticated caller instead of rejecting the request.

The fix changes GET /device to claim the pending row for the calling session. The approve and deny gates now require strict equality between the row's owner and the calling session. RFC 8628 §5.5 covers this risk class as Session Spying: a malicious party can hijack a session by completing authorization before the legitimate initiating user does.

Patches

Fixed in better-auth@1.6.11. After the patch, GET /device claims the pending row for the calling session, and POST /device/approve and POST /device/deny reject calls whose session does not match the claimed owner. Custom verification pages must serve GET /device to an authenticated session for the flow to succeed.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately:

  • Disable the plugin if you do not use the device flow: remove deviceAuthorization() from your plugins array.
  • Add a before hook on POST /device/approve and POST /device/deny that tracks which session called GET /device for each user code, and rejects calls from a different session.
  • Shorten the pending lifetime of device codes via the expiresIn plugin option to reduce the exploitation window.

Impact

  • Account takeover on the polling device: the attacker's session becomes the device's session, so the device operates as the attacker.
  • Denial of the legitimate sign-in: the attacker can mark the code as denied, blocking the victim's flow.

Credit

Reported by Quikturn Security Team.

References

@gustavovalverde gustavovalverde published to better-auth/better-auth May 31, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 4, 2026
Reviewed Jun 4, 2026
Last updated Jun 4, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Authorization

The product does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. Learn more on MITRE.

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

The product does not sufficiently verify the origin or authenticity of data, in a way that causes it to accept invalid data. Learn more on MITRE.

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. Learn more on MITRE.

Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-45337

GHSA ID

GHSA-cq3f-vc6p-68fh

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.