Skip to content

Skipper: Unbounded Request Body Read in Admission Webhook Causes Memory Exhaustion DoS

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 5, 2026 in zalando/skipper • Updated Jul 17, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/zalando/skipper (Go)

Affected versions

< 0.26.22

Patched versions

0.26.22

Description

Summary

The Kubernetes admission webhook handler reads the entire request body using io.ReadAll(r.Body) without any size limit. Any client that can reach the webhook port within the cluster can send a multi-GB payload, causing the skipper process to exhaust memory and be OOM-killed. This disrupts all Kubernetes admission control, potentially blocking all pod creation and updates.

Vulnerable Code

// dataclients/kubernetes/admission/admission.go:76
body, err := io.ReadAll(r.Body)  // <-- NO SIZE LIMIT
if err != nil {
    log.Errorf("Failed to read request: %v", err)
    w.WriteHeader(http.StatusInternalServerError)
    invalidRequests.WithLabelValues(admitterName).Inc()
    return
}

var review admissionReview
err = json.Unmarshal(body, &review)

For comparison, the OPA filter has a body size limit:

// filters/openpolicyagent/openpolicyagent.go:68-70
const DefaultMaxRequestBodySize = 1 << 20 // 1MB

// OPA uses a bufferedBodyReader with size limits

Attack Path

  1. Attacker identifies the admission webhook endpoint (default: :9443/admission or configured path)
  2. Attacker sends: POST /admission HTTP/1.1, Content-Type: application/json with a multi-GB request body
  3. io.ReadAll(r.Body) allocates unbounded memory for the entire body
  4. Skipper process is OOM-killed by the Kubernetes kubelet

Permission Boundary Analysis

  • Attacker: Any client with network access to the admission webhook port within the Kubernetes cluster
  • Boundary crossed: Memory safety — unbounded allocation from attacker-controlled input
  • Preconditions: Admission webhook endpoint must be network-reachable (default Kubernetes deployment exposes it within cluster network)
  • Comparison: OPA filter has DefaultMaxRequestBodySize (1MB) and semaphore-based memory limit; admission handler has neither

Evidence

File Lines Description
dataclients/kubernetes/admission/admission.go 76 io.ReadAll(r.Body) without size limit
filters/openpolicyagent/openpolicyagent.go 68-70 OPA filter has DefaultMaxRequestBodySize = 1MB
filters/openpolicyagent/openpolicyagent.go 1333-1336 OPA uses bufferedBodyReader with size limits

Tests

  • dataclients/kubernetes/admission/admission_test.go exists but does not test body size limits

Impact

The admission webhook handler reads the entire request body using io.ReadAll(r.Body) without a size limit. An attacker with in-cluster network access and a valid Kubernetes client certificate can send a multi-GB payload to the webhook endpoint, causing the skipper process to exhaust memory and be OOM-killed. This disrupts admission control for Ingress and RouteGroup resources until the process is automatically restarted by the kubelet.

Scope of impact: Ingress and RouteGroup admission only — not pod creation or other admission controllers.

Recovery: Kubernetes automatically restarts the OOM-killed process, limiting downtime.

Prerequisites: (1) In-cluster network access to the webhook port, (2) valid Kubernetes client certificate.

Mitigation

  1. Add http.MaxBytesReader or equivalent body size limit before io.ReadAll
  2. Follow the OPA filter pattern: define DefaultMaxRequestBodySize and use a buffered reader with size limits
  3. Add a configurable --admission-max-body-size flag

References

@szuecs szuecs published to zalando/skipper Jun 5, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 17, 2026
Reviewed Jul 17, 2026
Last updated Jul 17, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-54247

GHSA ID

GHSA-cwxq-rc9x-2jvv

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.