Skip to content

xygeni-action v5 tag poisoned with C2 backdoor

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 11, 2026 in xygeni/xygeni-action • Updated Mar 11, 2026

Package

actions xygeni/xygeni-action (GitHub Actions)

Affected versions

>= 5, < 6.4.0

Patched versions

6.4.0

Description

Description

On March 3, 2026, an attacker with access to compromised credentials created a series of pull requests (#46, #47, #48) injecting obfuscated shell code into action.yml. The PRs were blocked by branch protection rules and never merged into the main branch.

However, the attacker used the compromised GitHub App credentials to move the mutable v5 tag to point at the malicious commit (4bf1d4e19ad81a3e8d4063755ae0f482dd3baf12) from one of the unmerged PRs. This commit remained in the repository's git object store, and any workflow referencing @v5 would fetch and execute it.

The malicious code, disguised as a "scanner version telemetry" step, operates as follows:

  1. Registers the CI runner with a C2 server at 91.214.78.178 (via security-verify.91.214.78.178.nip.io), transmitting hostname, username, and OS version.
  2. Polls the C2 server every 2–7 seconds for 180 seconds, receiving and executing arbitrary shell commands via eval.
  3. Compresses and base64-encodes command output before exfiltrating it back to the C2 server.

The implant runs silently in the background alongside the legitimate scan, suppresses all errors, skips TLS certificate verification, and uses randomized polling intervals to evade detection.

Impact

This is a supply chain compromise via tag poisoning. Any GitHub Actions workflow referencing xygeni/xygeni-action@v5 during the affected window (approximately March 3–10, 2026) executed a C2 implant that granted the attacker arbitrary command execution on the CI runner for up to 180 seconds per workflow run.

The severity is set to Critical based on the potential impact. However, several factors reduce the realized risk: the v5 tag was primarily referenced by Xygeni-owned and Xygeni-affiliated repositories; no external public repositories were found using the compromised tag (though usage in private repositories cannot be ruled out); the exposure window was approximately 6 days; and no confirmed exploitation of downstream users has been established to date.

Patches

The compromised v5 tag has been removed from the repository. Users should update their workflows to pin to the verified safe commit SHA corresponding to v6.4.0:

uses: xygeni/xygeni-action@13c6ed2797df7d85749864e2cbcf09c893f43b23 # v6.4.0

Workflows still referencing @v5 will fail with a reference not found error, as the tag no longer exists.

If your workflows ran with @v5 during the affected window, you should also:

  • Rotate all secrets that were available to the CI runner (repository secrets, environment secrets, deploy keys, cloud provider tokens).
  • Audit CI logs for outbound connections to 91.214.78.178 or DNS lookups for security-verify.91.214.78.178.nip.io.
  • Review recent releases and published artifacts for signs of tampering.

Workarounds

As an alternative to using the GitHub Action, you may install and run the Xygeni scanner directly via the CLI installation method documented at https://docs.xygeni.io/xygeni-scanner-cli/xygeni-cli-overview/xygeni-cli-installation. This bypasses the GitHub Action entirely and is not affected by this incident.

References

References

@lmrb-1968 lmrb-1968 published to xygeni/xygeni-action Mar 11, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Mar 11, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 11, 2026
Reviewed Mar 11, 2026
Last updated Mar 11, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability High
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(18th percentile)

Weaknesses

Embedded Malicious Code

The product contains code that appears to be malicious in nature. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-31976

GHSA ID

GHSA-f8q5-h5qh-33mh

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.