Skip to content

Portainer's Kubernetes middleware continues after token validation failure, bypassing endpoint authorization

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 10, 2026 in portainer/portainer • Updated Jun 9, 2026

Package

gomod github.com/portainer/portainer (Go)

Affected versions

>= 2.33.0, < 2.33.8

Patched versions

2.33.8

Description

Summary

Portainer proxies requests to Kubernetes clusters through a middleware layer (kubeClientMiddleware) that validates the requesting user's token before forwarding traffic to the cluster. When security.RetrieveTokenData returned an error, the middleware wrote an HTTP 403 response but was missing a return statement — execution continued into the handler with a nil tokenData value.

The Kubernetes endpoints sit behind Portainer's outer AuthenticatedAccess bouncer, so an attacker requires a valid Portainer session. However, a user whose secondary token validation fails in kubeClientMiddleware — for example a user without permission to access a given Kubernetes endpoint — would have their request forwarded to the cluster anyway, bypassing the authorization check. The same defect was present in both the CE and EE codebases.

Severity

High
CWE-863 — Incorrect Authorization

Privilege required is Low — any valid Portainer session is sufficient to reach the middleware. Once the authorization outcome is bypassed, the attacker can read and modify Kubernetes resources on the target endpoint that their role should not permit — confidentiality and integrity impact are both High. No availability impact is introduced directly.

Affected Versions

The missing return statement has been present since Kubernetes proxy support was introduced.

Branch First vulnerable Fixed in
2.33.x (LTS) 2.33.0 2.33.8

Portainer 2.39.0 and later are not affected — the fix was present from the initial 2.39.0 release. All releases prior to 2.33.0 are end-of-life and will not receive a fix; users on EOL versions should upgrade to a supported release.

Workarounds

There is no configuration change that prevents the bypass directly. Administrators who cannot immediately upgrade can reduce exposure by:

  • Restricting Kubernetes endpoint access. Remove Portainer access to Kubernetes endpoints for users who do not require it. A user without endpoint access cannot reach kubeClientMiddleware.
  • Auditing Kubernetes RBAC. Ensure the service account Portainer uses to proxy cluster requests carries least-privilege RBAC permissions — this limits the blast radius if the bypass is exploited.

Neither of these replaces the fix.

Affected Code

kubeClientMiddleware in api/http/handler/kubernetes/handler.go wrote the error response but did not return, allowing execution to continue with nil tokenData:

// api/http/handler/kubernetes/handler.go (pre-fix — CE and EE)
tokenData, err := security.RetrieveTokenData(r)
if err != nil {
    httperror.WriteError(w, http.StatusForbidden,
        "permission denied to access the environment", err)
    // missing return — tokenData is nil, execution continues
}

// tokenData.ID dereferenced on the next line:
_, ok := handler.KubernetesClientFactory.GetProxyKubeClient(
    strconv.Itoa(endpointID), strconv.Itoa(int(tokenData.ID)))

The fix adds a single return after the WriteError call in both CE and EE:

// post-fix
if err != nil {
    httperror.WriteError(w, http.StatusForbidden,
        "permission denied to access the environment", err)
    return
}

Impact

  • Kubernetes authorization bypass. A low-privileged Portainer user can reach Kubernetes API endpoints on environments their role does not permit, with the proxy client of the legitimate session used as the vehicle.
  • Cluster resource access. Depending on the service account permissions Portainer holds on the cluster, the attacker can read or modify namespaced resources — including pods, secrets, config maps, and deployments.
  • Potential for lateral movement. Kubernetes secrets readable through this path may contain credentials for other services within the cluster or the broader infrastructure.

Timeline

  • 2026-02-16: Fix merged to develop.
  • 2026-02-25: 2.39.0 released with fix.
  • 2026-05-07: 2.33.8 released with backport fix.

References

@predlac predlac published to portainer/portainer May 10, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 14, 2026
Reviewed May 14, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 28, 2026
Last updated Jun 9, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(25th percentile)

Weaknesses

Incorrect Authorization

The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-44882

GHSA ID

GHSA-mgq6-4x29-88r3

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.