Skip to content

h3 v1 has Request Smuggling (TE.TE) issue

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jan 15, 2026 in h3js/h3 • Updated Jan 15, 2026

Package

npm h3 (npm)

Affected versions

<= 1.15.4

Patched versions

1.15.5

Description

I was digging into h3 v1 (specifically v1.15.4) and found a critical HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability.

Basically, readRawBody is doing a strict case-sensitive check for the Transfer-Encoding header. It explicitly looks for "chunked", but per the RFC, this header should be case-insensitive.

The Bug: If I send a request with Transfer-Encoding: ChuNked (mixed case), h3 misses it. Since it doesn't see "chunked" and there's no Content-Length, it assumes the body is empty and processes the request immediately.

This leaves the actual body sitting on the socket, which triggers a classic TE.TE Desync (Request Smuggling) if the app is running behind a Layer 4 proxy or anything that doesn't normalize headers (like AWS NLB or Node proxies).

Vulnerable Code (src/utils/body.ts):

if (
    !Number.parseInt(event.node.req.headers["content-length"] || "") &&
    !String(event.node.req.headers["transfer-encoding"] ?? "")
      .split(",")
      .map((e) => e.trim())
      .filter(Boolean)
      .includes("chunked") // <--- This is the issue. "ChuNkEd" returns false here.
  ) {
    return Promise.resolve(undefined);
  }

I verified this locally:

  • Sent a Transfer-Encoding: ChunKed request without a closing 0 chunk.
  • Express hangs (correctly waiting for data).
  • h3 responds immediately (vulnerable, thinks body is length 0).

Impact: Since H3/Nuxt/Nitro is often used in containerized setups behind TCP load balancers, an attacker can use this to smuggle requests past WAFs or desynchronize the socket to poison other users' connections.

Fix: Just need to normalize the header value before checking: .map((e) => e.trim().toLowerCase())

References

@pi0 pi0 published to h3js/h3 Jan 15, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jan 15, 2026
Reviewed Jan 15, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jan 15, 2026
Last updated Jan 15, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(5th percentile)

Weaknesses

Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')

The product acts as an intermediary HTTP agent (such as a proxy or firewall) in the data flow between two entities such as a client and server, but it does not interpret malformed HTTP requests or responses in ways that are consistent with how the messages will be processed by those entities that are at the ultimate destination. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-23527

GHSA ID

GHSA-mp2g-9vg9-f4cg

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.