Skip to content

gix's submodule name validation bypass + trust inheritance flaw enables path traversal and credential disclosure

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 25, 2026 in GitoxideLabs/gitoxide • Updated May 5, 2026

Package

cargo gix (Rust)

Affected versions

< 0.83.0

Patched versions

0.83.0
cargo gix-validate (Rust)
<= 0.10.0
0.11.1

Description

Summary

Submodule name validation bypass plus missing validation in production code paths allows path traversal via crafted .gitmodules. Combined with a trust inheritance flaw in Submodule::open(), this enables reading arbitrary git repository configs (including credentials) from traversed paths with full trust (CWE-22, CWE-200).

Details

Bug 1: Validation bypass in gix-validate/src/submodule.rs (lines 27-42)

The name() function uses name.find(b"..") which returns only the FIRST occurrence. If the first .. is embedded in a non-traversal context, the function returns Ok without checking subsequent ../ sequences:

pub fn name(name: &BStr) -> Result<&BStr, name::Error> {
    match name.find(b"..") {
        Some(pos) => {
            let &b = name.get(pos + 2).ok_or(name::Error::ParentComponent)?;
            if b == b'/' || b == b'\\' {
                Err(name::Error::ParentComponent)
            } else {
                Ok(name)  // Returns Ok without checking rest of string
            }
        }
        None => Ok(name),
    }
}

Bypass: a..b/../../../.git/ passes because find(b"..") returns position 1 (the .. in a..b), checks name[3] == b'b', and returns Ok. The real /../../../ is never checked.

Bug 2: Validation never called in production

gix_validate::submodule::name() has zero production callers (only test code). The names() iterator in gix-submodule/src/access.rs:29 explicitly documents it returns "unvalidated names."

git_dir() at gix/src/submodule/mod.rs:198-204 constructs filesystem paths from raw names:

pub fn git_dir(&self) -> PathBuf {
    self.state.repo.common_dir().join("modules").join(gix_path::from_bstr(self.name()))
}

Bug 3: Trust inheritance bypass in Submodule::open()

At gix/src/submodule/mod.rs:270, open() clones the parent repository's options:

match crate::open_opts(self.git_dir_try_old_form()?, self.state.repo.options.clone()) {

The parent's options.git_dir_trust is Some(Trust::Full). At gix/src/open/repository.rs:103-104:

if options.git_dir_trust.is_none() {
    options.git_dir_trust = gix_sec::Trust::from_path_ownership(&git_dir)?.into();
}

Since trust is already Some(Full), the ownership check is skipped entirely. The traversed path is opened with Trust::Full regardless of ownership, bypassing gitoxide's safe-directory protections.

PoC

Compiled and executed in Rust 1.94.1 --release mode. All bypass cases confirmed:

BYPASS a..b/../../../.git/           -> PASSED validation
       git_dir = .git/modules/a..b/../../../.git/
       normalized = .git/              (parent repo!)

BYPASS x..y/../../../.git/config     -> PASSED validation
       git_dir = .git/modules/x..y/../../../.git/config
       normalized = .git/config

Attack chain

  1. Attacker crafts a repository with .gitmodules:

    [submodule "x..y/../../.."]
    path = innocent
    url = https://attacker.com/repo.git

  2. Victim clones the repository using a tool built on gitoxide.

  3. When the tool iterates submodules and calls submodule.open() or submodule.status():

    • git_dir() returns .git/modules/x..y/../../.. which resolves to the parent .git/
    • open_opts() is called with Trust::Full (inherited from parent, ownership check skipped)
    • The parent's .git/config is fully parsed

  4. The returned Repository object exposes all config values from the traversed path:

    • remote.origin.url (may contain https://user:token@github.com/...)
    • http.extraHeader (often Authorization: Bearer <token>)
    • credential.* sections
    • core.sshCommand

  5. Accessible via standard API: repo.config_snapshot().string("http.extraHeader"), repo.find_remote("origin"), etc.

Impact

A crafted .gitmodules in a malicious repository causes gitoxide to open arbitrary git directories as submodule repositories with full trust, exposing their configuration including credentials. This is the same class of vulnerability as GHSA-7w47-3wg8-547c (path traversal), but through the submodule name vector with an additional trust bypass.

The trust inheritance is the critical amplifier: without it, the traversed path would undergo ownership checks that could block the attack. With it, any git directory reachable via ../ is opened with full trust.

Honest limitations

  • The traversed path must be a valid git directory (HEAD, objects/, refs/ must exist)
  • The victim's tool must call open() or status() on submodules (tools that only list submodules are not affected)
  • Credential exposure requires the target config to contain embedded credentials
  • Submodule operations currently require explicit user action

Suggested fix

  1. Fix the validation to check ALL .. occurrences (iterate, not single find)
  2. Call gix_validate::submodule::name() in git_dir() before constructing the path
  3. Do NOT inherit git_dir_trust from parent when opening submodule repos -- always re-derive trust from path ownership

Severity

High. Network vector (via clone), requires user interaction (submodule operations). The trust bypass enables credential disclosure from traversed git directories. Confidentiality impact is high.

References

@Byron Byron published to GitoxideLabs/gitoxide Apr 25, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 5, 2026
Reviewed May 5, 2026
Last updated May 5, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements Present
Privileges Required None
User interaction Active
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability High
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-p3hw-mv63-rf9w

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.