Version update

[fallion]

Important

Refactor git package to replace go-git with direct git command execution, updating commit, branch, and tag handling logic and tests.

• Behavior:
  • Refactor BranchDiffCommits in branch_diff_commits.go to use git log for commit comparison, improving efficiency.
  • Update Commit in commit.go to fetch commit details using git log commands.
  • Modify CommitsBetween in commits_between.go to handle empty hashes and use git log for commit retrieval.
  • Change CommitsOnBranch and CommitsOnBranchSimple in commits_on_branch.go and commits_on_branch_simple.go to use git log for fetching commits.
  • Revise CurrentBranch and CurrentCommit in current_branch.go and current_commit.go to use git commands for current state retrieval.
  • Adjust CurrentTag in current_tag.go to determine the current tag using git commands.
  • Refactor getTags in get_tags.go to fetch and sort tags using git for-each-ref.
  • Update LatestCommitOnBranch in latest_commit_on_branch.go to resolve branch commits using git rev-parse.
  • Modify PreviousTag in previous_tag.go to find previous tags using sorted tag data.
• Models:
  • Introduce Hash, Commit, Signature, and Reference types in types.go to replace go-git types.
• Testing:
  • Update tests in *_test.go files to align with new git command-based logic.
  • Add test_helpers.go for setting up test repositories and creating test data.
• Dependencies:
  • Remove go-git and related dependencies from go.mod and go.sum.

^{This description was created by for 400eb03. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Caution

Changes requested ❌

Reviewed everything up to 400eb03 in 2 minutes and 39 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 1667 lines of code in 28 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 5 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. branch_diff_commits.go:29

• Draft comment:
  When NewHash fails (lines 29-32), the error is silently skipped. Consider logging the parsing error to help debug unexpected invalid hashes.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% This comment is suggesting a "consider logging" change, which is not a clear code change requirement. It's a suggestion for potential debugging improvements. The rules state "Do NOT comment unless there is clearly a code change required" and "Do NOT make speculative comments." This falls into the category of a speculative improvement - "consider logging to help debug unexpected invalid hashes" implies this might be useful IF there are unexpected invalid hashes, but there's no evidence this is actually a problem. The git command output should always be valid hashes, so this is a defensive suggestion rather than fixing an actual issue. The comment could be valid if there's a real risk of invalid hashes appearing in production and causing silent failures that would be hard to debug. Logging errors is generally a good practice, especially when silently skipping data. While logging is generally good practice, the comment uses "consider" language which makes it non-actionable. It's a suggestion rather than identifying a clear problem. The git command should always return valid hashes, so this is speculative about a scenario that shouldn't happen. This violates the rule about not making speculative comments. This comment should be deleted because it uses "consider" language making it a suggestion rather than a clear code change requirement, and it's speculative about debugging a scenario that shouldn't occur with valid git output.

2. get_tags.go:17

• Draft comment:
  The custom delimiter '<TAG_SEP>' is used to split tag entries. Ensure that this delimiter cannot appear in tag data to avoid parsing errors.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% The comment is asking the author to ensure that a custom delimiter does not appear in tag data, which is a form of asking for confirmation or verification. This violates the rule against asking the author to ensure behavior is intended or to double-check things. Therefore, this comment should not be approved.

3. previous_tag.go:29

• Draft comment:
  The logic returns tags[0] when the current commit isn't tagged (lines 29-33). Confirm this behavior matches requirements, as it may be unexpected to return the most recent tag even if not attached to HEAD.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

4. branch_diff_commits.go:8

• Draft comment:
  Typographical/grammatical suggestion: In the comment on line 8, it currently states 'returns of a diff of them.' Consider rephrasing to 'returns a diff of them' for clarity.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is purely a typographical/grammatical suggestion, which is not related to the functionality or logic of the code. It doesn't provide a code suggestion or ask for a test, nor does it address any potential issues with the code itself. Therefore, it violates the rule against making purely informative comments.

5. commits_on_branch_simple.go:9

• Draft comment:
  Typo in comment: Consider changing "slimed down commit object" to "slimmed down commit object".
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was on unchanged code.

Workflow ID: wflow_9UcTTajr1J1QJM9w

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Multiple calls to g.runGitCommand (for commit message, author, committer, and dates) could be consolidated into a single command to improve performance.

[ellipsis-dev]

Each commit's message is fetched individually via a separate git log call (lines 42-46). Consider batching these calls if the branch has many commits to reduce overhead.