Conversation
There's no reason this module would export it
|
I wonder if there might be an opportunity for proving a theorem of the sort "if category X has property P, then sub-category Y of X (as witnesses by relation R) also has property P if P and R are related in way Z". As sort of "R preserves P". Is this what you meant by part 2 of the TODO? |
Yeah, that's exactly what I meant by part 2. |
|
The main thing stopping me from working on this PR is that I don't know where to put the tools for constructing terminal objects and binary products and things like that for object restrictions of categories. Any suggestions? I was thinking something like |
|
Why not put them directly in It might well be that some of the actual constructions should go elsewhere, and then just 'assembled' in the above? |
|
@Taneb It would be really nice to get this finished and merged in. What can I do to help? |
|
@JacquesCarette thanks for reminding me that this PR exists! I need to take another look at it to refamiliarise myself, it's been a while |
|
Another ping on this one - it would be nice to finish. I have some cycles to help. |
This is a WIP because: