Factor (co)end (co)limits into their own modules #452
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JacquesCarette
previously approved these changes
Feb 22, 2025
Collaborator
|
That might have been my 'fault' - I was going through Loregian's book and ran out of steam at some point. |
Collaborator
|
Hmm, the code looks good, but the CI isn't happy... |
Member
Author
|
CI failure is I need to change the imports in |
JacquesCarette
approved these changes
Feb 22, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Doing this has made it clear just how much more we have for ends than for coends... I'll save that for another PR though