Non-strict order equational reasoning#1229
Merged
felixwellen merged 7 commits intoagda:masterfrom Oct 8, 2025
Merged
Conversation
…attern matching instead of with-abstraction, move examples to a module
… uses additional data
Collaborator
|
In discussion, I was convinced there are applications for this -> merging this update. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following #1203, this adds facilities for equational reasoning involving mixed use of <, ≤, ≡;
extracting a non-strict inequality instead of a strict one.
To extract a non-strict inequality, the additional data of
<-≤-weakenis required (on top of what strict order already requires).The same notes as the previous PR apply, noting that now:
begin<orbegin≤is needed at the start of the chain, since it has to extract an inequality from the given chain.Changelog
The interface is now as follows:
<-≤-Reasoningrenamed to<-≤-StrictReasoningbegin_renamed tobegin<_<-≤-Reasoningbegin≤_The
SubRelationrecord has been deleted since it was out of place and not useful here, the instance has also been removed.Examples have been moved from a comment to a module, so that the compiler can check them for correctness in case of changes to the library.