Skip to content

Conversation

@LorenzoMolena
Copy link
Contributor

The definition is adapted from ordered fields present in the HoTT Book (defn 11.2.7).
This also adds a pseudolattice type with structure. The property was already encoded in Poset.Properties, but the record was missing.

@anshwad10
Copy link
Contributor

anshwad10 commented Aug 12, 2025

Thanks! (this is to resolve #1181 i presume?)

@LorenzoMolena
Copy link
Contributor Author

@anshwad10 the motivation was independent, but sure this provides ordered comm. rings, aiding with #1181.
Do you find this defn. reasonable?

@anshwad10
Copy link
Contributor

anshwad10 commented Aug 13, 2025

@LorenzoMolena This is a good definition 👍
However, on second thought, I think antithesis partial orders are useful in their own right, so maybe you could define something like a biordered set which has both a strict and non-strict ordering, and then put the weakening and bimodule laws in that?
Not that important though, this is enough

@mortberg
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me! Merging

@mortberg mortberg merged commit dc8f69e into agda:master Sep 26, 2025
1 check passed
mortberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants