docs: recommend uvx with airbyte@latest and --python flag for MCP setup #811
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: AJ Steers <[email protected]>
Original prompt from AJ Steers |
🤖 Devin AI EngineerI'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know: ✅ I will automatically:
Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository. ⚙️ Control Options:
|
👋 Greetings, Airbyte Team Member!Here are some helpful tips and reminders for your convenience. Testing This PyAirbyte VersionYou can test this version of PyAirbyte using the following: # Run PyAirbyte CLI from this branch:
uvx --from 'git+https://github.com/airbytehq/PyAirbyte.git@devin/1759345139-update-mcp-docs-uvx-latest' pyairbyte --help
# Install PyAirbyte from this branch for development:
pip install 'git+https://github.com/airbytehq/PyAirbyte.git@devin/1759345139-update-mcp-docs-uvx-latest'Helpful ResourcesPR Slash CommandsAirbyte Maintainers can execute the following slash commands on your PR:
Community SupportQuestions? Join the #pyairbyte channel in our Slack workspace. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughRewrote the MCP server configuration example in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)No sequence diagrams — documentation-only change, no control-flow modifications. Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
airbyte/mcp/__init__.py (2)
70-71: Consider clarifying "version pinning" terminology.The phrase "with version pinning to ensure you always get the latest stable release" might be a bit confusing, since "version pinning" traditionally means locking to a specific version (e.g.,
airbyte==1.2.3), whereas@latestdoes the opposite—it ensures you get the newest version. Would it be clearer to say something like "using@latestto ensure you always get the latest stable release" instead? wdyt?</invoke_comment_end -->
78-78: LGTM! Consider adding a note about @latest implications.The uvx command syntax looks good with the explicit Python version and @latest package specification. The choice of Python 3.11 as a middle ground between 3.10-3.12 makes sense.
One thought: since
@latestmeans users will automatically get new releases (including potentially breaking changes), would it be helpful to add a brief note in the documentation about this trade-off? Something acknowledging that while@latestprovides automatic updates, users who need stability might prefer pinning to a specific version? wdyt?</invoke_comment_end -->
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
airbyte/mcp/__init__.py(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Windows)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Windows)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (No Creds)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
airbyte/mcp/__init__.py (1)
87-89: LGTM! Clear recommendation hierarchy.The revised wording effectively emphasizes that
uvxwith@latestis the recommended approach while still documenting the pre-installation alternative. The text flows well and sets clear expectations for users.</invoke_comment_end -->
Co-Authored-By: AJ Steers <[email protected]>
…/git-manager.devin.ai/proxy/github.com/airbytehq/PyAirbyte into devin/1759345139-update-mcp-docs-uvx-latest
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
airbyte/mcp/__init__.py (1)
95-97: Consider clarifying trade-offs of pre-installation approach.The recommendation for
uvxwithairbyte@latestis clear, and the parenthetical note about "automatic updates" helps explain why it's preferred. Nice!However, when users choose the pre-install alternative, they lose both auto-updates and automatic Python version management. Should we briefly mention this trade-off or suggest they can still pin versions with
uv tool install airbyte@latestorpipx install airbyte==<version>? This might help users make an informed choice, wdyt?Something like:
-Alternatively, if you prefer to pre-install (though `uvx` with `airbyte@latest` is -recommended for automatic updates), first run `uv tool install airbyte` or -`pipx install airbyte`, and then create the configuration file as follows: +Alternatively, if you prefer to pre-install (though `uvx` with `airbyte@latest` is +recommended for automatic updates and Python version management), first run +`uv tool install airbyte` or `pipx install airbyte`, and then create the +configuration file as follows:
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
airbyte/mcp/__init__.py(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (No Creds)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
airbyte/mcp/__init__.py (2)
70-75: Clear and helpful guidance on uvx setup!The explanation about automatic Python installation and auto-updates is accurate and useful for users. The mention of alternative pinning options adds good flexibility.
One tiny wording suggestion: "If a matching version Python" could be "If a matching Python version" for slightly smoother reading, wdyt?
82-86: Verify packaging metadata for Python version requirements.I couldn’t find any
python_requiresorProgramming Language :: Python :: 3.xentries in the packaging metadata (pyproject.toml, setup.py, or setup.cfg). Could you confirm the package declares support for Python 3.10–3.12? If not, consider addingpython_requires=">=3.10,<3.13"or mentioning the supported range in the docs so users know they can adjust--pythonas needed. wdyt?
1 participant
docs: recommend uvx with airbyte@latest and --python flag for MCP setup
Summary
Updates PyAirbyte MCP documentation to recommend using
uvxwith version pinning (airbyte@latest) and explicit Python version specification (--python=3.11). This ensures users always get the latest stable release and can use a compatible Python version even if their system Python differs.Key changes:
uvx --python=3.11 --from=airbyte@latest airbyte-mcpReview & Testing Checklist for Human
uvx --python=3.11 --from=airbyte@latest airbyte-mcpactually works and starts the MCP server correctlyNotes
@latestsyntax ensures users get updates automatically vs being pinned to old versionsLink to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/10d9f92c120641dcb5f5cdb281484a6a
Requested by: @aaronsteers
Summary by CodeRabbit
Important
Auto-merge enabled.
This PR is set to merge automatically when all requirements are met.
Note
Auto-merge may have been disabled. Please check the PR status to confirm.