fix: (CDK) (Manifest) - Add deprecations support and handle deprecation warnings; deprecate url_base, path, request_body_json and request_body_data for HttpRequester
#486
Conversation
bazarnov
changed the title
deprecations support and deprecation warnings for deprecated manifest fieldsdeprecations support and handle deprecation warnings
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis update introduces a mechanism for handling deprecation warnings within Airbyte's declarative source framework. A new base model, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant TestReader
participant DeclarativeSource
participant ModelToComponentFactory
participant BaseModelWithDeprecations
User->>TestReader: run_test_read()
TestReader->>DeclarativeSource: deprecation_warnings()
DeclarativeSource->>ModelToComponentFactory: get_model_deprecations()
ModelToComponentFactory->>BaseModelWithDeprecations: collect _deprecation_logs
DeclarativeSource-->>TestReader: List[AirbyteLogMessage]
TestReader->>TestReader: _categorise_groups(..., deprecation_warnings)
TestReader-->>User: StreamRead (including deprecation warnings in logs)
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Would you like me to suggest adding some documentation or code comments to guide downstream connector developers on how to use or extend ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (1)
71-91: Overriding__getattribute__may impact performance.Overriding
__getattribute__is a powerful technique for intercepting attribute access, but it gets called for every attribute access which could impact performance. Have you considered using__getattr__instead, which is only called when an attribute is not found through normal means? It would be less comprehensive but more performant.Also, the exception handling seems to swallow all attribute errors, which might mask legitimate errors. Perhaps a more targeted exception handling approach would be better?
- def __getattribute__(self, name: str) -> Any: - """ - Show warnings for deprecated fields during field usage. - """ - - value = super().__getattribute__(name) - - try: - model_fields = super().__getattribute__(FIELDS_TAG) - field_info = model_fields.get(name) - is_deprecated_field = ( - field_info.field_info.extra.get(DEPRECATED, False) if field_info else False - ) - if is_deprecated_field: - deprecation_message = field_info.extra.get(DEPRECATION_MESSAGE, "") - self._deprecated_warning(name, deprecation_message) - except (AttributeError, KeyError): - pass - - return value + def __getattr__(self, name: str) -> Any: + """ + Called only for attributes that don't exist on the instance, + so we don't need to do anything here - just raise the standard AttributeError. + """ + raise AttributeError(f"{self.__class__.__name__} has no attribute '{name}'") + + def __getattribute__(self, name: str) -> Any: + """ + Show warnings for deprecated fields during field usage. + """ + + # Skip our special processing for dunder methods and our internal attributes + if name.startswith('__') or name == DEPRECATION_LOGS_TAG: + return super().__getattribute__(name) + + value = super().__getattribute__(name) + + # Only check for deprecation if this is a field defined in the model + try: + model_fields = super().__getattribute__(FIELDS_TAG) + if name in model_fields: + field_info = model_fields[name] + if field_info.field_info.extra.get(DEPRECATED, False): + deprecation_message = field_info.field_info.extra.get(DEPRECATION_MESSAGE, "") + self._deprecated_warning(name, deprecation_message) + except AttributeError: + # This happens when FIELDS_TAG isn't available, which is fine + pass + + return valuebin/generate_component_manifest_files.py (1)
32-87: Solid implementation of base model replacement for deprecated fields.The function looks great and serves its purpose well. It correctly identifies classes with deprecated fields and replaces their base model with
BaseModelWithDeprecations.Just noticed a tiny typo in the comment on line 62: "warinings" should be "warnings", wdyt?
Overall, great approach using regex to handle the class detection and replacement!
- # update the imports to include the new base model with deprecation warinings + # update the imports to include the new base model with deprecation warningsairbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py (1)
746-757: Well-implemented deprecation collection methodsThese new methods are clearly implemented:
get_model_deprecations()provides a public interface to access collected deprecation logs_collect_model_deprecations()properly handles the collection of deprecation warnings with duplicate preventionThe implementation follows good practices with appropriate attribute checking and exclusion of duplicate entries.
Would it be clearer to add a type hint directly to the class attribute declaration rather than just in the initialization? Something like:
_deprecation_logs: List[AirbyteLogMessage] = [] # As a class attributeThis would make the type more visible when reviewing the class, wdyt?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
airbyte_cdk/connector_builder/test_reader/reader.py(5 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_source.py(2 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py(2 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py(1 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py(4 hunks)bin/generate_component_manifest_files.py(4 hunks)unit_tests/connector_builder/test_connector_builder_handler.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (5)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py (3)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_source.py (1)
deprecation_warnings(41-45)unit_tests/connector_builder/test_connector_builder_handler.py (1)
deprecation_warnings(821-822)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py (1)
get_model_deprecations(746-750)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_source.py (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py (1)
deprecation_warnings(127-128)unit_tests/connector_builder/test_connector_builder_handler.py (1)
deprecation_warnings(821-822)
unit_tests/connector_builder/test_connector_builder_handler.py (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_source.py (1)
deprecation_warnings(41-45)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py (1)
deprecation_warnings(127-128)
airbyte_cdk/connector_builder/test_reader/reader.py (4)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_source.py (1)
deprecation_warnings(41-45)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py (1)
deprecation_warnings(127-128)unit_tests/connector_builder/test_connector_builder_handler.py (3)
deprecation_warnings(821-822)primary_key(802-803)cursor_field(806-807)airbyte_cdk/connector_builder/models.py (1)
LogMessage(25-29)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (1)
BaseModelWithDeprecations(27-113)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (6)
1-5: Nice explanatory comment about the purpose of this file.The comment clearly explains that this is a static class model used for displaying deprecation warnings. Good practice to mention this upfront!
21-24: Clear constant definitions.Using constants for field names and attributes makes the code more maintainable and less prone to typos. Good practice!
42-47: Config setting to allow extra fields.Setting the
extra = "allow"is a good choice here as it ensures models can have additional fields not explicitly defined, which is important for backward compatibility when dealing with deprecated fields.
51-70: Good implementation of checking for deprecated fields during initialization.The method properly checks if initialized fields are marked as deprecated and triggers warnings accordingly. I like the use of the field's extra attributes to store deprecation metadata.
92-114: Solid implementation of warning method.The method emits a warning using the standard Python warning system and also collects it as an Airbyte log message. Good documentation and clear parameter names.
16-19:❓ Verification inconclusive
Global warning format looks good, but have you considered potential side effects?
Redefining the global
warnings.formatwarningaffects all warnings in the application, not just deprecation warnings from this model. Is this the intended behavior or would a more targeted approach be better, wdyt?
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if warnings.formatwarning is modified elsewhere in the codebase rg -A 1 "warnings\.formatwarning\s*=" --type pyLength of output: 299
Global warning format change may affect all warnings globally – can you confirm this behavior is intended, or would a more targeted approach be preferable?
I noticed that the global override of
warnings.formatwarninginairbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py(lines 16–19) is the only instance in the codebase. This means any warning, not just deprecation warnings, will be formatted by this lambda. Could you verify if this global effect is desired, or would you consider scoping it (for example, using a context manager) to avoid unintended side effects? wdyt?airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py (2)
18-26: Clean import addition for AirbyteLogMessage.Adding
AirbyteLogMessageto the existing imports fromairbyte_cdk.modelsis tidy and follows the project's import style.
127-129: Well-implemented deprecation_warnings method.The method follows a consistent pattern with other methods in the class, properly delegating to the constructor's
get_model_deprecations()method. The fallback to an empty list is a good defensive programming practice.airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_source.py (2)
7-11: Clean import additions.You've correctly added the necessary imports for the new method while maintaining the project's import style.
41-45: Good base implementation of deprecation_warnings.Providing a default implementation that returns an empty list is a solid approach for the base class. This ensures that all subclasses have a consistent interface, even if they don't override this method.
unit_tests/connector_builder/test_connector_builder_handler.py (2)
10-10: Updated typing import to include List.The import update ensures that
Listis available for the type annotation in the new method.
821-822: Added mock implementation for deprecation_warnings.Your mock implementation matches the base class behavior, returning an empty list. This ensures tests will continue to work with the updated interface.
bin/generate_component_manifest_files.py (2)
103-105: Integration with post-processing looks good.The function call to
replace_base_model_for_classes_with_deprecated_fieldsis well-placed in the post-processing pipeline, ensuring that all generated code gets the appropriate base class replacements before being written to disk.
141-146: Great addition of field extra keys for deprecation support.The command-line arguments for
datamodel-codegenare well-documented with clear comments explaining their purpose. This enables the code generator to preserve the deprecation metadata from the YAML schema files.airbyte_cdk/connector_builder/test_reader/reader.py (4)
116-117: Good addition of deprecation warnings retrieval.This line properly connects to the new
deprecation_warnings()method on the source, supporting the broader feature of collecting and exposing deprecation warnings.
133-133: Passing deprecation warnings to _categorise_groups looks good.Simple but effective update to pass the newly retrieved deprecation warnings to the method for processing.
246-250: Well-typed parameter addition for deprecation warnings.The optional parameter is properly typed and has an appropriate default value. This ensures backward compatibility while enabling the new functionality.
311-321: Clean implementation of deprecation warning processing.The new code follows the existing pattern for processing message groups, which is great for consistency. I like the use of Python's pattern matching feature for type checking.
The error handling for unknown types of deprecation warnings matches the existing error handling for unknown message group types, maintaining consistency in the codebase.
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py (4)
30-30: Import addition looks goodAdding
AirbyteLogMessageto the imports is necessary for handling the new deprecation logging functionality.
111-114: Clean imports for new deprecation functionalityThe imports for the new deprecation-related components are clearly organized and properly separated in their own import statement.
591-592: Good initialization of deprecation logs listAdding
_deprecation_logsas a class attribute initialized with an empty list in the constructor is the right approach. The comment provides helpful context.
739-743: Proper handling of model deprecationsThe code correctly checks if the model is an instance of
BaseModelWithDeprecationsbefore attempting to collect deprecation logs. This maintains compatibility with existing models while adding support for the new deprecation-aware models.
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py(2 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py(1 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-pokeapi' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-amplitude' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-hardcoded-records' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
- GitHub Check: SDM Docker Image Build
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (3)
49-70: LGTM! Good initialization handling for deprecated fieldsThe implementation properly initializes
_deprecation_logsas an instance attribute (addressing previous review comments) and correctly checks for deprecated fields during component initialization.
17-19: Clean warning format customizationNice simplification of the warning format that focuses on what's important - the category and message, without the noisy file/line information.
91-112: The warning message implementation looks goodThe method properly emits warnings through Python's built-in system and collects them in the instance's log collection. This dual approach ensures visibility both in standard output and in the Connector Builder UI.
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
bazarnov
changed the title
deprecations support and handle deprecation warningsdeprecations support and handle deprecation warnings; deprecate url_base and path for HttpRequester
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml (1)
4184-4184: Missing newline at end of file.The static analysis tool detected that there's no newline character at the end of the file. While this won't affect functionality, it's a common convention to have files end with a newline. Would you like to add one, wdyt?
- '{{ "goodbye, cruel world" | regex_search("goodbye,\s(.*)$") }} -> "cruel world"' + '{{ "goodbye, cruel world" | regex_search("goodbye,\s(.*)$") }} -> "cruel world"' +🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 4184-4184: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py (1)
2173-2285: Consider adding a code example for the new URL approach in the documentation.The field documentation is clear, but would it be helpful to add a short example in the class docstring that shows how to migrate from
url_base+pathto the new unifiedurlapproach? This could make it even easier for developers to understand the migration path, wdyt?airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py (4)
111-114: Minor import consolidation question.Imports from
base_model_with_deprecationslook straightforward. Would you consider grouping them in a single line for cleanliness, or are you good with this layout? wdyt?
591-592: Optional data structure improvement.Storing deprecation logs in a list works but checking for duplicates can be O(n). Would you consider using a set to handle membership checks if these logs grow large? wdyt?
746-750: Refine return type for deprecation retrieval?Currently returns
List[Any]. Would you consider specifyingList[AirbyteLogMessage]since you are returning log messages? wdyt?
752-766: Optimize duplicate detection loop if many logs are expected.Checking if a log is in
_collected_deprecation_logsruns in O(n) time with a list. If performance becomes a concern, how about using a set for constant-time membership checks? wdyt?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml(3 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py(1 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py(5 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py(8 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/requesters/http_requester.py(6 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/requesters/requester.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/requesters/requester.py (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/requesters/http_requester.py (1)
get_url(130-143)airbyte_cdk/sources/types.py (1)
StreamSlice(66-160)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (1)
BaseModelWithDeprecations(27-122)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/requesters/http_requester.py (1)
HttpRequester(37-478)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml
[error] 4184-4184: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-pokeapi' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-amplitude' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-hardcoded-records' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: SDM Docker Image Build
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
🔇 Additional comments (20)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (1)
27-123: Impressive implementation of the deprecation handling system!The
BaseModelWithDeprecationsclass is well-designed with clear documentation and separation of concerns. The approach of emitting both standard Python warnings and collecting custom Airbyte log messages is elegant and practical.Just one thought - I notice you're initializing
_deprecation_logsas an instance variable in the constructor, which is great. This addresses the shared state concern that was raised in a previous review. The implementation looks solid now!airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/requesters/requester.py (1)
37-48: LGTM! Clean addition of theget_urlabstract method.The method signature is well-defined with appropriate type annotations and the docstring clearly explains its purpose. This addition provides a good abstraction for URL handling that can be implemented by concrete requester classes.
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml (3)
1871-1890: Good approach for deprecatingurl_basewhile maintaining backward compatibility.The deprecation is clearly marked with an informative message pointing users to the new
urlfield. The description update properly informs users that this field is deprecated.
1891-1909: Well-structured replacementurlproperty with matching capabilities.The new
urlproperty maintains all the interpolation contexts and examples fromurl_base, ensuring a smooth transition for users. Nice implementation!
1911-1914: Consistent approach with thepathdeprecation.The deprecation message for
pathconsistently directs users to use theurlfield instead, which aligns well with the overall approach.airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/requesters/http_requester.py (6)
58-60: Looks like a clean approach to field deprecation!Adding the new optional
urlfield while keepingurl_baseallows for backward compatibility. This graceful transition will help users to migrate their existing connectors at their own pace.
73-84: Good implementation of the deprecation transition.The
__post_init__logic handles both new and deprecated fields appropriately, and I appreciate that you added clear comments to indicate which fields are deprecated. This helps other developers understand the code evolution.
130-144: Well-implemented newget_urlmethod.This method follows the same pattern as other getters in the class and properly handles the interpolation context for the URL template. Good work on maintaining consistency with the existing codebase style.
145-174: Solid implementation of URL resolution logic.The
_get_urlmethod nicely handles the different URL construction scenarios with a clear priority order: usingurl_base+pathifurl_baseexists, otherwise usingurl+pathif path exists, or justurl. This ensures backward compatibility while supporting the new approach.
404-414: Good update to the_join_urlmethod.Making the
pathparameter optional is consistent with the overall deprecation approach, and the documentation has been updated to reflect this change.
454-459: Nice refactoring of the URL construction insend_request.Using the new
_get_urlmethod here centralizes the URL construction logic, which makes the code more maintainable and consistent. Good example of the DRY principle.airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py (7)
11-13: Good addition of the new import.The import of
BaseModelWithDeprecationsis properly organized, and it's a good practice to have the deprecation mechanism in a separate module for better code organization.
885-897: Type field added and field optionality improved forKeyTransformation.The required
typefield and makingprefixandsuffixoptional with improved type hints will help with model validation. This should provide better flexibility for users.
918-922: Consistent update to thekey_transformationfield type.Making this field optional aligns with the changes to the
KeyTransformationclass. Good attention to detail in ensuring consistency across model relationships.
2173-2174: Great choice of base class for enabling deprecation warnings.Changing the base class to
BaseModelWithDeprecationsis the key change that enables the whole deprecation warning mechanism. This is an elegant way to add this functionality without affecting existing code too much.
2175-2187: Properly structured deprecation ofurl_base.The field is now optional, correctly marked as deprecated, and includes a helpful message pointing users to the new
urlfield. The description has also been updated to indicate it's deprecated.
2188-2198: Well-documented newurlfield.The new field has comprehensive documentation and examples that match the style of the previous
url_basefield. This will make it clear to users how to migrate to the new field.
2199-2210: Properly structured deprecation ofpath.Like with
url_base, thepathfield is correctly marked as deprecated with an informative message directing users to the new approach. This consistency is important for a smooth transition.airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py (2)
30-30: Imports look good.The addition of
AirbyteLogMessage,FailureType, andLevelappears consistent with the rest of the codebase. No issues spotted.
740-742: Conditional call to collect deprecations.This is a solid approach for automatically collecting deprecation logs. No concerns here.
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (2)
17-19: Consider the implications of globally modifying warning formatThis change to
warnings.formatwarningaffects all warnings in the application, not just the ones from this class. Would it make more sense to scope this to only your deprecation warnings by using a custom warning display function instead of modifying the global one, wdyt?-warnings.formatwarning = ( - lambda message, category, *args, **kwargs: f"{category.__name__}: {message}" -) +def _display_deprecation_warning(message: str, category: Type[Warning], *args, **kwargs) -> None: + formatted_message = f"{category.__name__}: {message}" + # Use the warnings module to emit the warning, but with custom formatting + warnings._showwarnmsg_impl(warnings.WarningMessage( + message=message, category=category, filename=args[0], + lineno=args[1], file=args[2], line=args[3] + ))Or at minimum, add a comment explaining the global modification and its potential impact on other parts of the codebase.
129-131: Consider optimizing duplicate detectionThe current approach compares entire
AirbyteLogMessageobjects to check for duplicates. For large numbers of deprecation warnings, would it be more efficient to compare just the message strings instead, wdyt?- if deprecation_log_message not in self._deprecation_logs: + # Check if this message text already exists in the logs + if not any(log.message == deprecation_log_message.message for log in self._deprecation_logs): # Avoid duplicates in the deprecation logs self._deprecation_logs.append(deprecation_log_message)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (2)
49-60: The initialization order looks goodThe implementation looks solid - you've addressed the previous concern about the class-level
_deprecation_logsattribute by initializing it at the instance level in__init__. The order of operations (initializing Pydantic internals first, then processing fields) makes sense.
1-132: Overall implementation is robust and well-documentedThis class provides a solid foundation for handling deprecation warnings in declarative components. I particularly like how thorough the docstrings are and the dual approach of emitting both Python warnings and Airbyte log messages.
One thing to consider: this implementation warns about deprecated fields but doesn't actually handle migration logic. For fields that are deprecated in favor of new ones (like
url_base/path→url), would it make sense to add automatic migration logic to maintain backward compatibility while still encouraging the new field usage, wdyt?
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml (3)
1890-1907: Validate the newurlfield definition
Theurlproperty neatly replaces theurl_base+pathcombo, and the interpolation contexts/examples look consistent. Do we need to update any spec documentation or add it to arequiredblock when bothurl_baseandpathare absent? wdyt?
1909-1913: Ensurepathdeprecation consistency
pathis also deprecated in favor ofurl, matching theurl_basepattern. Would it be helpful to include a migration example in thedeprecation_messageor description to guide users through updating manifests? wdyt?
4182-4182: Add newline at end-of-file
YAMLlint flagged a missing newline at EOF. Could you add a blank line after line 4181 to satisfy the linter? wdyt?🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 4182-4182: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml
[error] 4182-4182: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-pokeapi' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-amplitude' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-hardcoded-records' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: SDM Docker Image Build
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml (1)
1871-1874: Confirmurl_basedeprecation alignment
I seeurl_baseis now marked as deprecated with a cleardeprecation_messageand updated description—nice work! Should we double‑check that it’s been removed from anyrequiredlists or external docs to avoid confusion? wdyt?
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (2)
56-58: Consider moving instance variables to type hints.Would it be clearer to declare these instance variables with type annotations at the class level, even though you're initializing them in
__init__? This would make the class interface more explicit, wdyt?class BaseModelWithDeprecations(BaseModel): + _default_deprecation_messages: List[str] + _deprecation_logs: List[AirbyteLogMessage] class Config:
105-117: Consider clarifying attribute purpose with a more descriptive name.The method
_set_deprecation_logs_attr_to_modelis setting an attribute usingsetattr, but the purpose might not be immediately clear. Is the attribute being set for access by external code, or for internal use? Maybe a more descriptive name would help, wdyt?airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml (3)
1907-1912: Suggest adding URL format validation
To ensure clients provide valid URLs, could we addformat: uriunder theurl_baseproperty? wdyt?url_base: deprecated: true deprecation_message: "Use `url` field instead." title: API Base URL - type: string + type: string + format: uri
1929-1930: Suggest adding URL format validation
Similarly, should we addformat: urito the newurlfield to enforce proper URL syntax? wdyt?url: title: The URL of an API endpoint description: The URL of the API source. ... - type: string + type: string + format: uri
1945-1948: Suggest enforcing path format
For the deprecatedpathproperty, could we addformat: uri-referenceor apattern: '^/'to validate it's a valid URL path? wdyt?path: deprecated: true deprecation_message: "Use `url` field instead." title: URL Path - description: Deprecated, use the `url` instead. Path ... + description: Deprecated, use the `url` instead. Path ... + format: uri-reference
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml(3 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py(1 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py(5 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py(8 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml
[error] 4218-4218: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-pokeapi' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-amplitude' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-hardcoded-records' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: SDM Docker Image Build
🔇 Additional comments (7)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (7)
1-25: Well-structured file header, imports, and constants.The code includes proper imports, a custom warning formatter, and constants for field tags and deprecation metadata. The warning formatter is a nice touch to produce cleaner output.
27-48: BaseModelWithDeprecations class is well-documented and designed.The class purpose and behavior are clearly explained in the docstring. Setting
extra = "allow"in the Config makes sense for a model that needs to handle potentially deprecated fields.
49-65: Constructor initialization flow looks good.I like how you initialize the parent class first, set up placeholders for messages and logs, and then process the fields in a clear sequence.
66-81: Helper methods have good fallback behavior.The
_is_deprecated_fieldand_get_deprecation_messagemethods nicely handle the case when a field isn't in__fields__.
118-139: Good handling of duplicate warnings.I appreciate the checks for duplicate messages in both
self._default_deprecation_messagesandself._deprecation_logsto prevent showing the same warning multiple times.
137-138: Potential concern with duplicate warnings between instances.Since
deprecation_log_message not in self._deprecation_logsonly checks for duplicates within a single instance, is there a risk of showing duplicate warnings across different instances of the same model type with the same deprecated fields? Or is this handled at a higher level in themodel_to_component._collect_model_deprecations()?
140-146: Warning emission is simple and effective.The method to emit warnings is clean and straightforward. Using Python's built-in warning system is a good choice here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (3)
1-1: Copyright year needs to be updatedThe copyright notice has the year 2025, but the current year is 2024. Would it make sense to update this to the current year, wdyt?
-# Copyright (c) 2025 Airbyte, Inc., all rights reserved. +# Copyright (c) 2024 Airbyte, Inc., all rights reserved.
63-78: Consider optimizing the field access pattern for readability and performanceThe
_is_deprecated_fieldand_get_deprecation_messagemethods have similar patterns of accessing field information and checking if a field exists. Maybe we could extract the common field access logic to reduce duplication and improve performance by avoiding multiple dictionary lookups?- def _is_deprecated_field(self, field_name: str) -> bool: - return ( - self.__fields__[field_name].field_info.extra.get(DEPRECATED, False) - if field_name in self.__fields__.keys() - else False - ) - - def _get_deprecation_message(self, field_name: str) -> str: - return ( - self.__fields__[field_name].field_info.extra.get( - DEPRECATION_MESSAGE, "<missing_deprecation_message>" - ) - if field_name in self.__fields__.keys() - else "<missing_deprecation_message>" - ) + def _get_field_extra(self, field_name: str): + """Helper method to get field extra information if the field exists.""" + if field_name in self.__fields__: + return self.__fields__[field_name].field_info.extra + return {} + + def _is_deprecated_field(self, field_name: str) -> bool: + """Check if a field is marked as deprecated.""" + return self._get_field_extra(field_name).get(DEPRECATED, False) + + def _get_deprecation_message(self, field_name: str) -> str: + """Get the deprecation message for a field.""" + return self._get_field_extra(field_name).get( + DEPRECATION_MESSAGE, "<missing_deprecation_message>" + )What do you think about this refactoring approach?
123-123: Consider adding more context to the deprecation messageThe warning message is informative, but it might be helpful to add a reference to where users can find more information about the deprecation or migration guidelines. Maybe add a link to documentation or a note about where to look for alternatives?
- deprecated_message = f"Component type: `{self.__class__.__name__}`. Field '{field_name}' is deprecated. {message}" + deprecated_message = f"Component type: `{self.__class__.__name__}`. Field '{field_name}' is deprecated. {message} See our documentation for migration guidelines."What do you think? Is there documentation we could point to?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
airbyte_cdk/connector_builder/test_reader/reader.py(3 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_source.py(2 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py(2 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py(1 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py(8 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- airbyte_cdk/connector_builder/test_reader/reader.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_source.py
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (2)
airbyte_cdk/connector_builder/models.py (1)
LogMessage(25-29)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py (16)
Config(134-135)Config(148-149)Config(162-163)Config(176-177)Config(194-195)Config(208-209)Config(222-223)Config(236-237)Config(250-251)Config(264-265)Config(278-279)Config(292-293)Config(308-309)Config(322-323)Config(336-337)Config(370-371)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-pokeapi' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-amplitude' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-hardcoded-records' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
- GitHub Check: SDM Docker Image Build
🔇 Additional comments (5)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.py (5)
79-101: Great implementation of the field processing logicThe field processing method is well-structured and the logic for identifying and handling deprecated fields is clear. I especially like how you've added comprehensive docstrings explaining the purpose and behavior.
115-138: Effective warning and log message handlingThe implementation of warning creation and tracking is well done. I particularly like:
- The detailed warning message format with component type and field name
- The deduplication logic to avoid repeated warnings
- The dual approach of using both standard Python warnings and custom log messages
This provides good flexibility for different use cases.
139-145: Good implementation of warning emissionThe method for emitting collected deprecation warnings is simple and effective. Using Python's built-in warnings module is a good choice for this use case.
46-62: Excellent initialization sequenceI appreciate how you've structured the initialization process:
- First calling the parent constructor
- Setting up instance-level variables for message tracking
- Processing fields and emitting warnings
- Setting attributes on the model
This approach ensures everything is properly initialized before checking for deprecations.
24-45: Well-documented base class with clear purposeThe class documentation clearly explains the purpose and behavior of the model. The Config class properly allows extra fields, which is consistent with other models in the codebase.
bazarnov
changed the title
deprecations support and handle deprecation warnings; deprecate url_base and path for HttpRequesterdeprecations support and handle deprecation warnings; deprecate url_base, path, request_body_json and request_body_data for HttpRequester
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml (2)
4073-4092: DefineRequestBodyschema for payloads
The newRequestBodydefinition captures both JSON and data payload types. To ensure both fields are always provided, maybe consider adding arequired: [type, value]constraint? wdyt?
4301-4301: Add newline at end of file
YAMLlint flagged a missing newline at EOF. Could we append a blank line to satisfy thenew-line-at-end-of-filerule? wdyt?🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 4301-4301: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml(7 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/interpolation/interpolated_nested_mapping.py(1 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py(2 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py(7 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py(9 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/requesters/request_options/interpolated_request_options_provider.py(4 hunks)unit_tests/connector_builder/test_connector_builder_handler.py(2 hunks)unit_tests/sources/declarative/requesters/request_options/test_interpolated_request_options_provider.py(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py
- unit_tests/connector_builder/test_connector_builder_handler.py
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/requesters/request_options/interpolated_request_options_provider.py (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py (1)
RequestBody(1502-1504)airbyte_cdk/sources/streams/http/http.py (2)
request_body_data(212-227)request_body_json(229-240)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml
[error] 4301-4301: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-pokeapi' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-amplitude' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-hardcoded-records' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/interpolation/interpolated_nested_mapping.py (1)
15-15: Nicely broadened theNestedMappingtype signature.The type signature has been expanded to include
dict[str, Any], making it more flexible to handle a wider variety of data structures in nested mappings. This change aligns well with the needs for more complex request body handling.airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/requesters/request_options/interpolated_request_options_provider.py (4)
9-11: Clean import addition for the newRequestBodymodel.Good job adding the import for the RequestBody model class which will be used for the new unified request body handling.
44-44: Good addition of the newrequest_bodyattribute.This new optional attribute enables the unified request body handling that's being introduced. The type annotation correctly matches the imported RequestBody model.
54-57: Clear comments that explain the flow control.The added comments explain the sequence of request body resolution nicely, making the code more maintainable for future developers.
80-94: Well-implemented request body resolution method.This method provides a clean implementation for resolving the request body configuration. It appropriately handles the two possible types ("RequestBodyData" and "RequestBodyJson") and sets the corresponding attribute.
The docstring clearly explains the method's purpose, behavior, and potential errors. This is very helpful for maintainability.
unit_tests/sources/declarative/requesters/request_options/test_interpolated_request_options_provider.py (3)
7-7: Good import of the RequestBody model for testing.The import is correctly added to support the new tests for the RequestBody functionality.
135-198: Comprehensive test coverage for JSON request body handling.This test thoroughly verifies that JSON request bodies wrapped in the new RequestBody model work correctly with interpolation. It reuses the same test cases as the direct request_body_json tests, ensuring consistent behavior between the old and new approaches.
The test initialization correctly uses the RequestBody model with the "RequestBodyJson" type, and properly verifies the interpolation results.
238-278: Thorough test coverage for data request body handling.Similar to the JSON test, this test verifies that data request bodies wrapped in the RequestBody model work correctly. It maintains consistency by reusing the same test cases as the direct request_body_data tests.
The test correctly initializes the RequestBody with the "RequestBodyData" type and verifies that interpolation works as expected.
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml (6)
1919-1924: Markurl_baseas deprecated with clear guidance
Great to seeurl_baseflagged as deprecated and pointing users to the newurlfield for endpoint definitions. wdyt?
1939-1956: Introduceurlfor full endpoint URLs
The newurlproperty cleanly replaces the spliturl_base+pathapproach and includes proper interpolation context. Looks consistent and intuitive—wdyt?
1958-1963: Deprecatepathin favor ofurl
Markingpathas deprecated with a directional message helps maintain backward compatibility while steering users to the unifiedurl. wdyt?
2003-2004: Deprecaterequest_body_data
Switchingrequest_body_datato point at the new unifiedrequest_bodyfield streamlines payload handling. wdyt?
2023-2024: Deprecaterequest_body_json
Similarly, deprecatingrequest_body_jsonin favor ofrequest_bodyis a nice consolidation. wdyt?
2043-2072: Add unifiedrequest_bodyfield
Consolidating JSON and form-data into a singlerequest_bodyunion (RequestBodyreference) simplifies the schema and improves clarity. wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml (2)
1939-1957: Refine theurlfield description for clarity?
You've introduced the newurlproperty perfectly. Could we tweak its description to explicitly mention that it expects the full API endpoint URL (not just the API source base), in line with UI usage patterns? wdyt?
4305-4305: Add newline at end of file
YAMLLint flagged a missing newline at EOF. Could we append a blank line to satisfy thenew-line-at-end-of-filerule? wdyt?🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 4305-4305: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
airbyte_cdk/manifest_migrations/migrations/registry.yaml(1 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml(7 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py(2 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py(7 hunks)airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py(9 hunks)unit_tests/manifest_migrations/conftest.py(5 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- airbyte_cdk/manifest_migrations/migrations/registry.yaml
- unit_tests/manifest_migrations/conftest.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/manifest_declarative_source.py
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/declarative_component_schema.py
- airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/parsers/model_to_component_factory.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml
[error] 4305-4305: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-pokeapi' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-amplitude' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-shopify' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Check: 'source-hardcoded-records' (skip=false)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.11, Ubuntu)
- GitHub Check: SDM Docker Image Build
- GitHub Check: Pytest (Fast)
- GitHub Check: Pytest (All, Python 3.10, Ubuntu)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/declarative_component_schema.yaml (5)
1919-1924: Deprecateurl_baseproperty
Nice work deprecating the oldurl_basefield in favor of the consolidatedurlfield! Thedeprecated: trueflag anddeprecation_messageare clear and guide users smoothly.
1958-1973: Deprecatepathproperty
The deprecation ofpathin favor of the unifiedurlmakes the schema more ergonomic, and the warning message is on point.
2007-2014: Deprecaterequest_body_dataproperty
Great job markingrequest_body_dataas deprecated with a clear replacement notice pointing torequest_body.
2027-2034: Deprecaterequest_body_jsonproperty
Similarly, therequest_body_jsondeprecation is implemented correctly and steers users towards the newrequest_bodyabstraction.
2047-2076: Introduce unifiedrequest_bodyproperty
The newrequest_bodyfield elegantly unifies JSON and non-JSON payloads into a single abstraction—nice enhancement! 🥳
What
Resolves:
How
Updated Component Models:
HttpRequesterto support the newurlfield and prioritize it.url_baseandpathfields.Handling Deprecation Warnings:
deprecation_warningsmethod to theDeclarativeSourceandManifestDeclarativeSourceclass to collect and process deprecation notices._categorise_groups()to handle deprecation warnings alongside message groups.BaseModelWithDeprecations.airbyte_cdk/sources/declarative/models/base_model_with_deprecations.pymodule is added to cover thedeprecationwarnings for the fields marked asdeprecated. This class is static (not autogenerated) and re-used when thedeclarative_component_schema.pyis being generated. In this way, there is no need to set additional validations on top of the existing component implementations.User Impact
Deprecation Warning examples
The deprecation rules applied to the
declarative_component_schema.yamlare automatically picked up and propagated to thedeclarative_component_schema.py(auto-gen models), see the example bellow.Warning example
When
usingthe deprecated field orcreatingan instance of the class with the deprecated field.Python default behavior:
If multiple fields are marked as
deprecatedand used - more than 1 deprecation message is shown.Connector Builder behavior:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
urlfield in HTTP requesters, replacing the deprecatedurl_baseandpathfields.request_bodysupport for HTTP requests, replacing deprecatedrequest_body_dataandrequest_body_json.RequestBodymodel abstraction.