Add compare for experimental

[sgreenbury]

Closes #371.
Closes #427

[github-actions]

Coverage report

Click to see where and how coverage changed

File	Statements	Missing	Coverage	Coverage (new stmts)	Lines missing
autoemulate/emulators
gaussian_process.py
autoemulate/experimental
compare.py
model_selection.py
autoemulate/experimental/data
utils.py					87
autoemulate/experimental/emulators
__init__.py
base.py
lightgbm.py
autoemulate/experimental/emulators/gaussian_process
exact.py
autoemulate/experimental/emulators/neural_processes
conditional_neural_process.py
tests/experimental
test_experimental_base.py					124
test_experimental_compare.py
test_experimental_conditional_neural_process.py
test_experimental_model_selection.py					30
Project Total

This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.43590% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.57%. Comparing base (20f42e1) to head (c105b1d).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
autoemulate/experimental/data/utils.py	91.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
tests/experimental/test_experimental_base.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
.../experimental/test_experimental_model_selection.py	85.71%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #397      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.40%   90.57%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          93       96       +3     
  Lines        5877     5983     +106     
==========================================
+ Hits         5313     5419     +106     
  Misses        564      564              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[radka-j]

This looks great! We might want to think about how we handle multi output data (since not all models can be applied to it) but we can do that in a separate PR (I opened an issue #427).