Add rpc processor trait #1
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request introduces a new Sequence diagram for setAccount RPC methodsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant MetaIoHandler
participant JsonRpcRequestProcessor
participant Account Storage
Client->>MetaIoHandler: setAccount(address, accountData)
MetaIoHandler->>JsonRpcRequestProcessor: set_account(address, account)
JsonRpcRequestProcessor->>Account Storage: Update account
Account Storage-->>JsonRpcRequestProcessor: Confirmation
JsonRpcRequestProcessor-->>MetaIoHandler: Result
MetaIoHandler-->>Client: Result
Sequence diagram for cloneAccountFromCluster RPC methodsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant MetaIoHandler
participant JsonRpcRequestProcessor
participant Remote Cluster
participant Account Storage
Client->>MetaIoHandler: cloneAccountFromCluster(address, url)
MetaIoHandler->>JsonRpcRequestProcessor: clone_account_from_cluster(address, url)
JsonRpcRequestProcessor->>Remote Cluster: Fetch account data from url
Remote Cluster-->>JsonRpcRequestProcessor: Account data
JsonRpcRequestProcessor->>Account Storage: Update account
Account Storage-->>JsonRpcRequestProcessor: Confirmation
JsonRpcRequestProcessor-->>MetaIoHandler: Result
MetaIoHandler-->>Client: Result
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
@l r |
|
No operation ID found for this PR |
|
The code modifications mostly involve extending the JSON RPC service with new methods ("setAccount", "cloneAccountFromCluster") and refactoring how the RPC server is built and configured in the Sequence diagram for setAccount RPC methodsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant MetaIoHandler
participant JsonRpcRequestProcessor
participant Account Storage
Client->>MetaIoHandler: setAccount(address, accountData)
MetaIoHandler->>JsonRpcRequestProcessor: set_account(address, account)
JsonRpcRequestProcessor->>Account Storage: Update account
Account Storage-->>JsonRpcRequestProcessor: Confirmation
JsonRpcRequestProcessor-->>MetaIoHandler: Result
MetaIoHandler-->>Client: Result
Sequence diagram for cloneAccountFromCluster RPC methodsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant MetaIoHandler
participant JsonRpcRequestProcessor
participant Remote Cluster
participant Account Storage
Client->>MetaIoHandler: cloneAccountFromCluster(address, url)
MetaIoHandler->>JsonRpcRequestProcessor: clone_account_from_cluster(address, url)
JsonRpcRequestProcessor->>Remote Cluster: Fetch account data from url
Remote Cluster-->>JsonRpcRequestProcessor: Account data
JsonRpcRequestProcessor->>Account Storage: Update account
Account Storage-->>JsonRpcRequestProcessor: Confirmation
JsonRpcRequestProcessor-->>MetaIoHandler: Result
MetaIoHandler-->>Client: Result
General Quality:
Style:
Security:
Specific issues:
Recommendations:
Additional style notes:
Summary:
Final note: Without knowing the internal implementation of Conclusion: The code is of good quality, with the main oversight being the lack of tests and potential security considerations if these methods are exposed externally. Otherwise, the style and security are balanced and follow established patterns. |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @0xrinegade - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider adding a feature flag to enable the test request processor instead of a config option.
- It might be worth extracting the common fields between
LiveJsonRpcRequestProcessorandTestJsonRpcRequestProcessorinto a shared struct.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟡 Complexity: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
|
||
| let rp_clone = request_processor.clone(); | ||
|
|
||
| io.add_sync_method("setAccount", move |params: Params| { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (complexity): Consider extracting the parameter parsing and error handling logic into helper functions to reduce code duplication and improve readability.
Actionable Suggestion:
Extract the deep nested parameter parsing and error handling into helper functions. This not only cleans up the inline RPC method definitions but also avoids repeated code.
For example, you can create helpers for common tasks like verifying parameter count and parsing a Pubkey:
fn expect_params(params: &Params, expected: usize) -> Result<Vec<serde_json::Value>, jsonrpc_core::Error> {
let param_array = params.parse::<Vec<serde_json::Value>>()?;
if param_array.len() != expected {
return Err(jsonrpc_core::Error::invalid_params(format!(
"Expected exactly {} parameters",
expected
)));
}
Ok(param_array)
}
fn parse_pubkey(value: &serde_json::Value, field: &str) -> Result<Pubkey, jsonrpc_core::Error> {
let s = value.as_str().ok_or_else(|| {
jsonrpc_core::Error::invalid_params(format!("{} must be a string", field))
})?;
s.parse::<Pubkey>()
.map_err(|err| jsonrpc_core::Error::invalid_params(format!("Invalid {}: {}", field, err)))
}Refactor your RPC methods to use these helpers:
io.add_sync_method("setAccount", {
let rp_clone = request_processor.clone();
move |params: Params| {
let param_array = expect_params(¶ms, 2)?;
let address = parse_pubkey(¶m_array[0], "address")?;
// Additional helper for account data parsing could be added similarly...
// Example: let account_data = parse_account_data(¶m_array[1])?;
// Proceed with business logic using parsed data
rp_clone.set_account(&address, /* account data */)?;
Ok(jsonrpc_core::Value::String(format!("Account {} updated successfully", address)))
}
});Following similar steps for the second RPC method should reduce complexity while preserving functionality.
![devloai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/886113?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary:
This PR introduces a trait-based approach to the Solana JSON RPC service, supporting both live and test environments through a new JsonRpcRequestProcessor trait. It adds test-specific RPC methods (setAccount and cloneAccountFromCluster) that enable better testing capabilities, and implements a configuration flag to enable the test processor. The implementation includes necessary changes in both the RPC module and validator commands.
Review Summary:
The trait-based approach is a good architectural improvement that enhances testability. However, there are several concerns that should be addressed: a security vulnerability with external URL fetching, insufficient error handling, complex parameter validation, and some code duplication. I recommend addressing these issues before merging, particularly the security concern with unvalidated URLs.
Feel free to provide feedback on this review, which I'll take into account for future reviews.
Follow-up suggestions:
| if param_array.len() != 2 { | ||
| return Err(jsonrpc_core::Error::invalid_params( | ||
| "Expected exactly 2 parameters: [address, accountData]", | ||
| )); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using a cleaner validation approach for RPC parameters. The current nested error handling with multiple ok_or_else calls creates code that's difficult to follow. Consider creating a dedicated validation function or using a more structured approach like the serde validation system.
| .and_then(|v| v.as_array()) | ||
| .ok_or_else(|| { | ||
| jsonrpc_core::Error::invalid_params("Missing or invalid 'data' field") | ||
| })?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This method lacks proper error handling for the case where rp_clone.set_account() might fail but in a way that doesn't return a JSON-RPC error. Consider improving the error handling to capture all potential failure modes and provide clear error messages to API consumers.
|
|
||
| io.add_sync_method("cloneAccountFromCluster", move |params: Params| { | ||
| let param_array = params.parse::<Vec<serde_json::Value>>()?; | ||
| if param_array.len() != 2 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The clone_account_from_cluster method doesn't provide any validation or rate limiting for external URL requests, which could potentially be abused. Consider adding validation for the URL parameter (e.g., only allowing certain domains or formats) and implementing rate limiting to prevent abuse.
| max_complete_rewards_slot, | ||
| prioritization_fee_cache, | ||
| Arc::clone(&runtime), | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The duplicated code in both if branches for creating LiveJsonRpcRequestProcessor and TestJsonRpcRequestProcessor suggests poor DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) practice. Consider refactoring to use a single function that takes the processor type as a parameter to avoid code duplication and make future maintenance easier.
2 participants
This pull request introduces enhancements to the Solana JSON RPC service, including support for test configurations and new RPC methods for account management. Key changes include the addition of a test request processor, new RPC methods (
setAccountandcloneAccountFromCluster), and updates to dependencies to support these features.Enhancements to JSON RPC Service:
Support for Test Configurations:
JsonRpcRequestProcessorto use eitherTestJsonRpcRequestProcessororLiveJsonRpcRequestProcessorbased on thetest_request_processorflag in the configuration. This allows for easier testing and debugging. (rpc/src/rpc_service.rs, [1] [2]New RPC Methods:
setAccountmethod to update account details, including lamports, owner, executable flag, rent epoch, and data. (rpc/src/rpc_service.rs, rpc/src/rpc_service.rsR780-R905)cloneAccountFromClustermethod to clone an account from another cluster using a provided address and URL. (rpc/src/rpc_service.rs, rpc/src/rpc_service.rsR780-R905)Typed MetaIoHandler:
MetaIoHandlerto use a generic type forJsonRpcRequestProcessor, improving type safety and clarity. (rpc/src/rpc_service.rs, rpc/src/rpc_service.rsL740-R770)Dependency Updates:
async-traitto the workspace dependencies inCargo.tomlto support asynchronous traits used in the new implementations. (rpc/Cargo.toml, rpc/Cargo.tomlR14)Configuration Changes:
test_request_processorflag to theexecutefunction in the validator command to enable the use of the test request processor. (validator/src/commands/run/execute.rs, validator/src/commands/run/execute.rsR671)#### ProblemSummary of Changes
Fixes #
Summary by Sourcery
Add support for RPC processor trait and test configuration in Solana JSON RPC service
New Features:
setAccountandcloneAccountFromClusterfor test validatortest_request_processorto enable test-specific RPC functionalityEnhancements:
Chores: