Skip to content

Conversation

@mattsse
Copy link
Member

@mattsse mattsse commented May 19, 2025

this would be an expensive workaround

instead of a lazy single bloom, this computes the original BloomFilter again, that was incorrectly changed in #2140 and stores that in a oncelock instead of the single bloom

ref paradigmxyz/reth#16354

@mattsse mattsse closed this May 20, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in Alloy May 20, 2025
@mattsse mattsse reopened this May 20, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Done to In Progress in Alloy May 20, 2025
@mattsse mattsse marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 07:33
Copy link
Member

@fgimenez fgimenez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, smol doc nit

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Reviewed in Alloy May 20, 2025
@mattsse mattsse changed the title fix: check each bloom fix!: check each bloom May 20, 2025
@mattsse mattsse merged commit e76136a into main May 20, 2025
26 checks passed
@mattsse mattsse deleted the matt/check-each-bloom-individually branch May 20, 2025 08:06
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Reviewed to Done in Alloy May 20, 2025
jgomez360 pushed a commit to jgomez360/alloy that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2025
* fix: check each bloom

* fix: check each bloom

* fix: check each bloom

* Update crates/rpc-types-eth/src/filter.rs

Co-authored-by: Federico Gimenez <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Federico Gimenez <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants