Skip to content

docs update - #295

Merged
altendky merged 4 commits into
altendky:release/v0.8.0from
niketh-keshavan:niketh/release-v0.8.0
Jul 23, 2026
Merged

docs update#295
altendky merged 4 commits into
altendky:release/v0.8.0from
niketh-keshavan:niketh/release-v0.8.0

Conversation

@niketh-keshavan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@altendky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

let me know when this is ready and i'll merge. i just figured out the read the docs integration issue i think so should be able to release when you're ready. and yeah, you'll find more and we'll release again. i just need to have the process working. it's been awhile...

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.90%. Comparing base (6a83985) to head (07cf634).

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release/v0.8.0     #295   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage           99.90%   99.90%           
===============================================
  Files                  35       35           
  Lines                2101     2101           
  Branches              294      294           
===============================================
  Hits                 2099     2099           
  Misses                  1        1           
  Partials                1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@niketh-keshavan
niketh-keshavan force-pushed the niketh/release-v0.8.0 branch from 3722be5 to 096348a Compare July 22, 2026 22:35
@niketh-keshavan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

LGTM. Issues will come up (how it goes...) but those can be addresses as they appear rather than holding indefinitely.

@altendky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

yeah, part of releasing quick here is just to find and work out the bugs in that process... so next time is easier again.

@altendky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

i'm not necessarily against it, but what is the reason for dropping pyside2 at this point? having at least one version that works on both can be nice for any of the (very few i suspect) other folks that might be using this.

@niketh-keshavan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

i'm not necessarily against it, but what is the reason for dropping pyside2 at this point? having at least one version that works on both can be nice for any of the (very few i suspect) other folks that might be using this.

I thought (incorrectly) that PySide 2 supported only up to 3.9. I'll update this, don't see any reason to keep it out

@altendky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

ah yeah, all those ragged matrix conditions... a pain. :[ thanks, i'll keep an eye out here.

@niketh-keshavan

niketh-keshavan commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ah yeah, all those ragged matrix conditions... a pain. :[ thanks, i'll keep an eye out here.

I'll follow your suggestions here. I'm not against developing a workaround for 5.15.2.1, but at the same time deprecating (or even just leaving it claimed untested) may be easier.

@altendky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

i'll take a look in the morning, thanks

@altendky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

ok, i missed the morning. and actually i'm starting with a question i guess. was there a failure you were seeing that lead to removing it? or do we just need to remove the removal notices from this pr

@niketh-keshavan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I guess I'm a bit confused here, I though 5.15.2.1 was the only Pyside 2 version compatible with 3.10 and currently:

pyside2 ~= 5.15, != 5.15.2, != 5.15.2.1

@niketh-keshavan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Also, the matrix currently excludes Pyside 2. I didn't see any errors, but it's also not getting tested.

Ha, for fun I reenabled 5.15.2.1 on my fork and it passed all CI. Let me open a PR (or update this one) here and see if it does the same.

@niketh-keshavan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

So, pytest-qt doesn't have support for Pyside 2 past 4.4.0. To maintain Pyside 2 testing this version could be forced, or Pyside 2 could just be left in untested. It's not like I was seeing specific errors before to remove it, it was just fully excluded from tests.

@altendky

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

thanks. i think its fine to leave it untested for now. i do tend to keep support around too long (pytest-twisted still runs on py2...) and it would be good to consider removal. we are indeed down to a very small potential support area there.

@niketh-keshavan

niketh-keshavan commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Seems ready to merge to me (minus whatever this codecov issue is). If it's worth looking into, let me know and I'll get it done before release.

Codecov failing from MacOS runners busy. Should pass once they run.

@altendky
altendky merged commit ebbb3ee into altendky:release/v0.8.0 Jul 23, 2026
30 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants