feat: add TypeScript support and testing setup#275
Conversation
|
Deploy preview for team-scope-test ready! ✅ Preview Built with commit a47c99d. |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @amondnet, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on modernizing the project's development stack by migrating the codebase to TypeScript and overhauling the testing infrastructure. It introduces robust static type checking, switches to Vitest for a faster and more integrated testing experience, and refines the build process to accommodate these changes.
Highlights
- TypeScript Migration: The core
index.jsfile has been renamed tosrc/index.tsand fully converted to TypeScript, including extensive type annotations for functions and variables. This introduces static type checking across the main application logic. - ESLint Configuration Update: ESLint has been reconfigured to support TypeScript, integrating
@typescript-eslintplugins and parser. This ensures consistent code style and catches potential issues in the new TypeScript codebase, with adjusted import rules to handle.tsand.tsxextensions. - Testing Framework Switch: The project's testing framework has been migrated from Jest to Vitest. This includes the removal of old Jest test files, the addition of new Vitest configuration (
vitest.config.ts), and a new test directory structure (test/index.test.ts), aiming for a faster and more integrated testing experience. - Build Process Refinement: The
package.jsonscripts have been updated to incorporate TypeScript compilation (tsc) as a build step. Thenccbuild process now targets the compiled TypeScript output, including minification for optimized distribution. - Dependency Updates: Various
@actionsdependencies,axios,common-tags, and@octokit/webhookshave been updated to their latest versions. Correspondingly, Jest-related development dependencies have been replaced with TypeScript and Vitest-related ones.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
|
Deploy preview for zeit-now-deployment-action-example-static ready! ✅ Preview Built with commit 2ac98d7. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request introduces TypeScript support and sets up a testing environment using Vitest. The changes include updates to ESLint configuration, package.json scripts, and the main action file. The code improvements include adding type annotations, improving error handling, and enhancing code readability. The review identified opportunities to improve type safety, simplify logic, and enhance error handling.
.eslintrc.json
Outdated
| "sourceType": "module" | ||
| }, | ||
| "ignorePatterns": ["example/*"] | ||
| "ignorePatterns": ["example/*", "dist/*", "test/*"], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding **/*.test.ts and **/*.test.tsx to the ignore patterns to prevent linting test files, as these often have different requirements than source files.
| "start": "node ./dist/src/index.js", | ||
| "package": "npm run build && ncc build dist/src/index.js -o dist --minify --no-cache --no-source-map-register", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The package script includes a build step, but it's not immediately clear what ncc does. Consider adding a comment to explain its purpose (e.g., 'Bundle the project with ncc').
src/index.ts
Outdated
| const args: string[] = []; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const match of s.matchAll(/'([^']*)'|"([^"]*)"|[^\s]+/gm)) { | ||
| const matches = Array.from(s.matchAll(/'([^']*)'|"([^"]*)"|[^\s]+/gm)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's generally a good practice to avoid unused variables. Although the linter is disabled for myError, it might be better to remove it if it's truly not needed, or use it for logging purposes.
|
|
||
| if (githubComment && githubToken) { | ||
| if (githubComment && githubToken && deploymentUrl && deploymentName) { | ||
| if (context.issue.number) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The condition githubComment && githubToken && deploymentUrl && deploymentName checks if deploymentUrl and deploymentName are truthy. However, it's possible for deploymentName to be an empty string, which is still truthy but might not be the desired behavior. Consider checking if deploymentName is a non-empty string.
- Introduced TypeScript configuration files (tsconfig.json, tsconfig.build.json) - Added Vitest configuration for testing (vitest.config.ts) - Created initial test file (index.test.ts) with a basic test case - Updated package.json scripts for TypeScript build and testing - Refactored ESLint configuration to support TypeScript - Implemented main action logic in TypeScript (index.ts)
- Introduced TypeScript configuration files (tsconfig.json, tsconfig.build.json) - Added Vitest configuration for testing (vitest.config.ts) - Created initial test file (index.test.ts) with a basic test case - Updated package.json scripts for TypeScript build and testing - Refactored ESLint configuration to support TypeScript - Implemented main action logic in TypeScript (index.ts)
|
|
Deploy preview for express-basic-auth ready! ✅ Preview Built with commit a47c99d. |
|
Code Review: TypeScript Support and Testing SetupI've thoroughly reviewed PR #275 which adds TypeScript support and modernizes the development setup. Here's my comprehensive feedback: ✅ Positive ChangesBuild System & Tooling
Code Quality Improvements
|
Code Review - PR #275: TypeScript Support and Testing SetupAfter reviewing this PR, I have identified several important issues and observations: 🚨 Critical Issues
🔍 Code Quality Issues
🔒 Security Concerns
⚡ Performance Considerations
🧪 Test Coverage
📋 GitHub Actions Workflow Issues
✅ Positive Changes
🎯 Recommendations
🚧 Blocking IssuesThis PR appears to be in an incomplete state and should not be merged until:
The changes show promise but need significant work to be production-ready. |
1 participant
No description provided.