Skip to content

Conversation

@lxfu1
Copy link
Member

@lxfu1 lxfu1 commented Dec 12, 2025

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 文档
    • 新增面积图演示,支持根据数值动态填充区域颜色
    • 包含中英文标题和预览截图

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 12, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

演练

新增一个React演示文件,展示Ant Design Area图表组件,配置静态数据、编码映射和样式,并在元数据文件中注册该演示。

更改

文件/内聚组 更改摘要
新增演示文件
site/examples/case/interactions/demo/area-fill.js
新增React函数组件 DemoSegmentedArea,定义Area图表配置(包括填充、多行数据、x/y/color编码、平滑曲线、y轴范围-100至100)并将其挂载到DOM
配置文件更新
site/examples/case/interactions/demo/meta.json
向演示数组添加新条目,包含文件名、中英文标题和截图URL

估计代码审查工作量

🎯 1 (简单) | ⏱️ ~5 分钟

  • 演示文件为静态配置,无复杂逻辑或交互处理
  • 元数据条目为结构化数据,内容量最少
  • 两个文件改动独立且明确

诗歌

🐰 新的图表在森林绽放,
面积填充色彩斑斓;
数值映射巧妙流畅,
演示清单又添佳作!✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed 标题准确反映了主要变更内容——添加了一个新的区域图示例文件,与实际的代码改动相符。
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/examples-area

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @lxfu1, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new interactive area chart example to the project's documentation. The example, built with React and @ant-design/plots, effectively visualizes segmented data, such as financial gains and losses, by applying distinct colors based on value ranges. This enhancement provides a clear demonstration of how to represent complex data trends visually, improving the overall utility of the documentation for users exploring charting capabilities.

Highlights

  • New Area Chart Example: A new example, area-fill.js, has been added to demonstrate an area chart with segmented coloring.
  • Segmented Data Visualization: The example showcases how to visualize data with both positive and negative values (e.g., gains and losses) using distinct colors for different segments.
  • Documentation Update: The meta.json file has been updated to include the new area chart example, making it discoverable in the documentation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@dosubot dosubot bot added the documentation 📖 Improvements or additions to documentation label Dec 12, 2025
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new area chart example. I've identified a few areas for improvement. In area-fill.js, the component implementation contains a critical syntax error due to missing commas and uses an incorrect property for chart smoothing. Additionally, the data structure is highly verbose and difficult to maintain. I've proposed a comprehensive refactoring of the component to address these issues, making the code correct, readable, and maintainable. For meta.json, I've suggested a clearer and more idiomatic English title for the new example. My feedback aims to enhance the quality and correctness of the new documentation example.

Comment on lines +5 to +346
const DemoSegmentedArea = () => {
const config = {
paddingLeft: 25,
data: [
{
'gained > 100$': 7,
'gained <= 100$': 21,
'lost <= 100$': -59,
'lost > 100$': -13,
user: 'John',
key: 'lost > 100$',
value: -13,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 7,
'gained <= 100$': 21,
'lost <= 100$': -59,
'lost > 100$': -13,
user: 'John',
key: 'lost <= 100$',
value: -59,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 7,
'gained <= 100$': 21,
'lost <= 100$': -59,
'lost > 100$': -13,
user: 'John',
key: 'gained <= 100$',
value: 21,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 7,
'gained <= 100$': 21,
'lost <= 100$': -59,
'lost > 100$': -13,
user: 'John',
key: 'gained > 100$',
value: 7,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 13,
'gained <= 100$': 33,
'lost <= 100$': -51,
'lost > 100$': -3,
user: 'Raoul',
key: 'lost > 100$',
value: -3,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 13,
'gained <= 100$': 33,
'lost <= 100$': -51,
'lost > 100$': -3,
user: 'Raoul',
key: 'lost <= 100$',
value: -51,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 13,
'gained <= 100$': 33,
'lost <= 100$': -51,
'lost > 100$': -3,
user: 'Raoul',
key: 'gained <= 100$',
value: 33,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 13,
'gained <= 100$': 33,
'lost <= 100$': -51,
'lost > 100$': -3,
user: 'Raoul',
key: 'gained > 100$',
value: 13,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 24,
'gained <= 100$': 47,
'lost <= 100$': -29,
'lost > 100$': 0,
user: 'Jane',
key: 'lost > 100$',
value: 0,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 24,
'gained <= 100$': 47,
'lost <= 100$': -29,
'lost > 100$': 0,
user: 'Jane',
key: 'lost <= 100$',
value: -29,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 24,
'gained <= 100$': 47,
'lost <= 100$': -29,
'lost > 100$': 0,
user: 'Jane',
key: 'gained <= 100$',
value: 47,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 24,
'gained <= 100$': 47,
'lost <= 100$': -29,
'lost > 100$': 0,
user: 'Jane',
key: 'gained > 100$',
value: 24,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 0,
'gained <= 100$': 16,
'lost <= 100$': -84,
'lost > 100$': 0,
user: 'Marcel',
key: 'lost > 100$',
value: 0,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 0,
'gained <= 100$': 16,
'lost <= 100$': -84,
'lost > 100$': 0,
user: 'Marcel',
key: 'lost <= 100$',
value: -84,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 0,
'gained <= 100$': 16,
'lost <= 100$': -84,
'lost > 100$': 0,
user: 'Marcel',
key: 'gained <= 100$',
value: 16,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 0,
'gained <= 100$': 16,
'lost <= 100$': -84,
'lost > 100$': 0,
user: 'Marcel',
key: 'gained > 100$',
value: 0,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 23,
'gained <= 100$': 44,
'lost <= 100$': -20,
'lost > 100$': -13,
user: 'Ibrahim',
key: 'lost > 100$',
value: -13,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 23,
'gained <= 100$': 44,
'lost <= 100$': -20,
'lost > 100$': -13,
user: 'Ibrahim',
key: 'lost <= 100$',
value: -20,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 23,
'gained <= 100$': 44,
'lost <= 100$': -20,
'lost > 100$': -13,
user: 'Ibrahim',
key: 'gained <= 100$',
value: 44,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 23,
'gained <= 100$': 44,
'lost <= 100$': -20,
'lost > 100$': -13,
user: 'Ibrahim',
key: 'gained > 100$',
value: 23,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 3,
'gained <= 100$': 38,
'lost <= 100$': -42,
'lost > 100$': -17,
user: 'Junko',
key: 'lost > 100$',
value: -17,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 3,
'gained <= 100$': 38,
'lost <= 100$': -42,
'lost > 100$': -17,
user: 'Junko',
key: 'lost <= 100$',
value: -42,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 3,
'gained <= 100$': 38,
'lost <= 100$': -42,
'lost > 100$': -17,
user: 'Junko',
key: 'gained <= 100$',
value: 38,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 3,
'gained <= 100$': 38,
'lost <= 100$': -42,
'lost > 100$': -17,
user: 'Junko',
key: 'gained > 100$',
value: 3,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 1,
'gained <= 100$': 3,
'lost <= 100$': -77,
'lost > 100$': -19,
user: 'Lyu',
key: 'lost > 100$',
value: -19,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 1,
'gained <= 100$': 3,
'lost <= 100$': -77,
'lost > 100$': -19,
user: 'Lyu',
key: 'lost <= 100$',
value: -77,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 1,
'gained <= 100$': 3,
'lost <= 100$': -77,
'lost > 100$': -19,
user: 'Lyu',
key: 'gained <= 100$',
value: 3,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 1,
'gained <= 100$': 3,
'lost <= 100$': -77,
'lost > 100$': -19,
user: 'Lyu',
key: 'gained > 100$',
value: 1,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 28,
'gained <= 100$': 59,
'lost <= 100$': -9,
'lost > 100$': -4,
user: 'André',
key: 'lost > 100$',
value: -4,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 28,
'gained <= 100$': 59,
'lost <= 100$': -9,
'lost > 100$': -4,
user: 'André',
key: 'lost <= 100$',
value: -9,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 28,
'gained <= 100$': 59,
'lost <= 100$': -9,
'lost > 100$': -4,
user: 'André',
key: 'gained <= 100$',
value: 59,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 28,
'gained <= 100$': 59,
'lost <= 100$': -9,
'lost > 100$': -4,
user: 'André',
key: 'gained > 100$',
value: 28,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 1,
'gained <= 100$': 9,
'lost <= 100$': -80,
'lost > 100$': -10,
user: 'Maki',
key: 'lost > 100$',
value: -10,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 1,
'gained <= 100$': 9,
'lost <= 100$': -80,
'lost > 100$': -10,
user: 'Maki',
key: 'lost <= 100$',
value: -80,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 1,
'gained <= 100$': 9,
'lost <= 100$': -80,
'lost > 100$': -10,
user: 'Maki',
key: 'gained <= 100$',
value: 9,
},
{
'gained > 100$': 1,
'gained <= 100$': 9,
'lost <= 100$': -80,
'lost > 100$': -10,
user: 'Maki',
key: 'gained > 100$',
value: 1,
},
],
encode: { x: 'user', y: 'value', color: 'key' },
shapeField: 'smooth',
scale: {
y: { domainMin: -100, domainMax: 100 },
color: {
domain: ['lost > 100$', 'lost <= 100$', 'gained <= 100$', 'gained > 100$'],
range: ['#61cdbb', '#97e3d5', '#f47560', '#e25c3b'],
},
},
};

return <Area {...config} />;
};

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The component implementation can be improved for correctness, readability, and maintainability.

  1. Critical Syntax Error: The config object literal is missing commas between its properties (data, encode, shapeField), which will cause a JavaScript syntax error and prevent the component from rendering.
  2. Incorrect Property: The shapeField: 'smooth' property is not the correct way to create a smooth area chart. You should use shape: 'smooth' instead.
  3. Data Structure: The data array is extremely verbose and contains a lot of redundant information. This makes the code hard to read and maintain. It's much cleaner to define the source data in a compact "wide" format and then programmatically transform it into the "long" format required by the chart.

I've combined fixes for all these issues into a single refactoring suggestion for the entire component.

const DemoSegmentedArea = () => {
  const sourceData = [
    { user: 'John', 'gained > 100$': 7, 'gained <= 100$': 21, 'lost <= 100$': -59, 'lost > 100$': -13 },
    { user: 'Raoul', 'gained > 100$': 13, 'gained <= 100$': 33, 'lost <= 100$': -51, 'lost > 100$': -3 },
    { user: 'Jane', 'gained > 100$': 24, 'gained <= 100$': 47, 'lost <= 100$': -29, 'lost > 100$': 0 },
    { user: 'Marcel', 'gained > 100$': 0, 'gained <= 100$': 16, 'lost <= 100$': -84, 'lost > 100$': 0 },
    { user: 'Ibrahim', 'gained > 100$': 23, 'gained <= 100$': 44, 'lost <= 100$': -20, 'lost > 100$': -13 },
    { user: 'Junko', 'gained > 100$': 3, 'gained <= 100$': 38, 'lost <= 100$': -42, 'lost > 100$': -17 },
    { user: 'Lyu', 'gained > 100$': 1, 'gained <= 100$': 3, 'lost <= 100$': -77, 'lost > 100$': -19 },
    { user: 'André', 'gained > 100$': 28, 'gained <= 100$': 59, 'lost <= 100$': -9, 'lost > 100$': -4 },
    { user: 'Maki', 'gained > 100$': 1, 'gained <= 100$': 9, 'lost <= 100$': -80, 'lost > 100$': -10 },
  ];

  const keys = ['lost > 100$', 'lost <= 100$', 'gained <= 100$', 'gained > 100$'];

  const data = sourceData.flatMap((item) => {
    return keys.map((key) => ({
      user: item.user,
      key,
      value: item[key],
    }));
  });

  const config = {
    paddingLeft: 25,
    data,
    encode: { x: 'user', y: 'value', color: 'key' },
    shape: 'smooth',
    scale: {
      y: { domainMin: -100, domainMax: 100 },
      color: {
        domain: keys,
        range: ['#61cdbb', '#97e3d5', '#f47560', '#e25c3b'],
      },
    },
  };

  return <Area {...config} />;
};

"filename": "area-fill.js",
"title": {
"zh": "根据数值填充面积颜色",
"en": "According to value fill area color"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The English title "According to value fill area color" is grammatically awkward and not very idiomatic. A clearer and more natural title would improve the documentation for English-speaking users.

Suggested change
"en": "According to value fill area color"
"en": "Fill Area Color by Value"

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
site/examples/case/interactions/demo/meta.json (1)

104-118: 英文标题可读性建议微调(非阻塞)
"According to value fill area color" 语法略生硬,建议改为更自然的表达(例如 “Fill area color by value” / “Color the area by value”),便于文档检索与阅读。

site/examples/case/interactions/demo/area-fill.js (2)

5-346: Demo 组件命名与文件意图不一致
文件是 area-fill.js,但组件名是 DemoSegmentedArea,容易让读者误以为是 “segmented-area”。建议改名为 DemoAreaFill(或类似)以匹配示例语义。


6-343: 数据字段冗余,可能干扰读者理解
当前 encode 只用到了 user/key/value,但每条数据里还包含 4 个冗余指标字段(如 'gained > 100$' 等)。建议删除这些未参与映射的字段,或在注释中说明其存在目的(否则读者会以为是“宽表”映射)。

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a707073 and 7fc0749.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • site/examples/case/interactions/demo/area-fill.js (1 hunks)
  • site/examples/case/interactions/demo/meta.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: test (latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (latest)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
site/examples/case/interactions/demo/area-fill.js (1)

6-343: 所有配置字段在 @ant-design/plots v2.6.6 中都已支持。验证确认:

  • encode: { x, y, color } — 使用 G2Plot encode 映射,正确
  • shapeField: 'smooth' — 在多个官方 Area 示例中使用(stacked-area、area-gradient、cascade-area 等),已验证支持
  • scale.y.domainMin/domainMax — v2 标准用法,正确
  • scale.color.domain/range — 调色板自定义方式,正确

此配置与代码库中其他 Area 图表示例保持一致,无兼容性问题。

return <Area {...config} />;
};

createRoot(document.getElementById('container')).render(<DemoSegmentedArea />);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

挂载点可能为 null:建议加守卫避免 demo 页直接报错
document.getElementById('container') 若返回 null,createRoot(null) 会直接抛错,导致整页示例不可用。建议显式判空。

-createRoot(document.getElementById('container')).render(<DemoSegmentedArea />);
+const container = document.getElementById('container');
+if (container) {
+  createRoot(container).render(<DemoSegmentedArea />);
+}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In site/examples/case/interactions/demo/area-fill.js around line 348, the mount
target may be null causing createRoot(null) to throw; add a null check for
document.getElementById('container') before calling createRoot and only call
createRoot(...).render(...) when the element exists (otherwise log a warning or
no-op) to prevent the demo page from crashing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation 📖 Improvements or additions to documentation size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants