Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Integrate zizmor checks to repo #818

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

MaxymVlasov
Copy link
Collaborator

That PR integrate one more static analysis tool, as CodeQL is good, but it not cover all cases
Here is an article about zizmor value - https://blog.yossarian.net/2024/12/06/zizmor-ultralytics-injection
zizmor repo - https://github.com/woodruffw/zizmor

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 14, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced our quality control workflow by integrating an updated code analysis step, ensuring improved product stability and overall reliability without affecting the user interface.

Walkthrough

The pull request adds a new entry to the pre-commit configuration in the .pre-commit-config.yaml file. A new repository is introduced for the zizmor hook sourced from https://github.com/woodruffw/zizmor-pre-commit at version v1.3.1. The change integrates this static analysis tool into the existing list of pre-commit hooks without modifying other parts of the configuration.

Changes

File Change Summary
.pre-commit-config.yaml Added new repository entry for a static analysis tool with the zizmor hook from woodruffw/zizmor-pre-commit at v1.3.1

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Free

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1e54f11 and 9bd1771.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1e54f11 and 9bd1771.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.9@windows-2025
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.12@windows-2025
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.11@windows-2025
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.12@macos-13
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.11@macos-13
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.10@windows-2025
  • GitHub Check: 🧪 Tests / pytest@🐍3.10@macos-13
  • GitHub Check: 🧹 Linters / pre-commit@🐍3.13@ubuntu-latest
  • GitHub Check: pre-commit
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.pre-commit-config.yaml (1)

68-72: LGTM! Good addition to the security tooling.

The integration of Zizmor as a pre-commit hook complements the existing security checks (gitleaks, detect-aws-credentials, detect-private-key) and provides additional coverage alongside CodeQL, specifically for GitHub Actions analysis.

Comment on lines +68 to +72
# Github Action static analysis tool
- repo: https://github.com/woodruffw/zizmor-pre-commit
rev: v1.3.1
hooks:
- id: zizmor
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify Zizmor version and consider additional configuration options.

The integration looks good, but let's verify a few things:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any issues or security advisories for zizmor-pre-commit

# Check for issues and PRs that might indicate problems with v1.3.1
gh api graphql -f query='
{
  repository(owner: "woodruffw", name: "zizmor-pre-commit") {
    issues(first: 5, states: OPEN) {
      nodes {
        title
        body
        createdAt
      }
    }
    releases(first: 1) {
      nodes {
        tagName
        createdAt
      }
    }
  }
}'

Length of output: 422


🌐 Web query:

What is the latest version of zizmor-pre-commit and what are its recommended configuration options?

💡 Result:

The latest version of zizmor-pre-commit is v1.1.1, as shown in configuration examples from multiple repositories including CPython's official GitHub repository[1][3]. This version is recommended for integration with pre-commit frameworks.

Recommended configuration options:

repos:
  - repo: https://github.com/woodruffw/zizmor-pre-commit
    rev: v1.1.1  # Latest stable release
    hooks:
      - id: zizmor

Key implementation details:

  • The hook requires no additional arguments by default[1]
  • Primarily targets YAML files in GitHub Actions workflows (/.github/workflows/)[6][7]
  • Works alongside other pre-commit hooks like Ruff and Black in typical Python project setups[3][6]

For security-focused repositories, consider combining it with complementary hooks like:

- repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks
  rev: v4.4.0
  hooks:
    - id: check-yaml
    - id: detect-private-key

Citations:


Action Required: Update Zizmor Pre-commit Version

  • The current configuration in .pre-commit-config.yaml uses rev: v1.3.1, but research indicates that the recommended stable version is v1.1.1.
  • Confirm that no additional configuration options are required for your integration. While Zizmor doesn't need extra arguments, you might consider complementary security hooks (e.g., check-yaml, detect-private-key) if needed.
  • The hook's placement between Prettier and Mypy appears logical and should not conflict with other checks.

@MaxymVlasov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

MaxymVlasov commented Feb 14, 2025

Oh, I see, there a bunch of issues in workflows needed to be fixed first

@MaxymVlasov MaxymVlasov marked this pull request as draft February 14, 2025 05:37
Copy link
Collaborator

@yermulnik yermulnik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hope at some point we won't end up running several dozens of GH actions over the handful of scripts that we maintain here 🤣

This comment was marked as resolved.

@github-actions github-actions bot added stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. and removed stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Mar 17, 2025
@MaxymVlasov MaxymVlasov added the on-hold Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Mar 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
on-hold Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants