add compute_budget_instruction_details to InstructionMeta

[apfitzge]

Problem

• Doing multiple loops to gather compute-budget instruction details

Summary of Changes

• Do a single loop within InstructionMeta

Fixes #

[apfitzge]

Benchmark Results:

`process_compute_budget_instructions`

bench_process_compute_budget_instructions_empty/0 instructions
                        time:   [35.477 µs 35.515 µs 35.550 µs]
                        thrpt:  [28.804 Melem/s 28.833 Melem/s 28.864 Melem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-4.2374% -3.9878% -3.7398%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+3.8851% +4.1535% +4.4249%]
                        Performance has improved.

bench_process_compute_budget_instructions_empty/0 instructions #2
                        time:   [35.113 µs 35.153 µs 35.197 µs]
                        thrpt:  [29.094 Melem/s 29.130 Melem/s 29.163 Melem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-5.0326% -4.7264% -4.4302%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+4.6355% +4.9608% +5.2993%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
  1 (1.00%) high severe

bench_process_compute_budget_instructions_no_builtins/4 dummy Instructions
                        time:   [65.301 µs 65.430 µs 65.572 µs]
                        thrpt:  [15.616 Melem/s 15.650 Melem/s 15.681 Melem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [+17.387% +17.732% +18.100%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-15.326% -15.061% -14.812%]
                        Performance has regressed.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
  1 (1.00%) high mild

bench_process_compute_budget_instructions_no_builtins/4 dummy Instructions #2
                        time:   [65.369 µs 65.492 µs 65.615 µs]
                        thrpt:  [15.606 Melem/s 15.635 Melem/s 15.665 Melem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [+17.464% +17.855% +18.262%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-15.442% -15.150% -14.868%]
                        Performance has regressed.

bench_process_compute_budget_instructions_compute_budgets/4 compute-budget instructions
                        time:   [70.959 µs 71.168 µs 71.372 µs]
                        thrpt:  [14.347 Melem/s 14.389 Melem/s 14.431 Melem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [+28.153% +28.680% +29.207%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-22.605% -22.288% -21.968%]
                        Performance has regressed.
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
  2 (2.00%) high mild

bench_process_compute_budget_instructions_compute_budgets/4 compute-budget instructions #2
                        time:   [71.905 µs 72.094 µs 72.293 µs]
                        thrpt:  [14.165 Melem/s 14.204 Melem/s 14.241 Melem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [+28.783% +29.209% +29.670%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-22.881% -22.606% -22.350%]
                        Performance has regressed.
Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
  1 (1.00%) high mild
  1 (1.00%) high severe

bench_process_compute_budget_instructions_builtins/4 dummy builtins
                        time:   [107.32 µs 107.46 µs 107.62 µs]
                        thrpt:  [9.5153 Melem/s 9.5289 Melem/s 9.5419 Melem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [+6.6307% +6.9359% +7.2563%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-6.7654% -6.4860% -6.2183%]
                        Performance has regressed.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
  1 (1.00%) high mild

bench_process_compute_budget_instructions_builtins/4 dummy builtins #2
                        time:   [107.16 µs 107.33 µs 107.53 µs]
                        thrpt:  [9.5230 Melem/s 9.5402 Melem/s 9.5560 Melem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [+7.2106% +7.5228% +7.8349%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-7.2656% -6.9965% -6.7257%]
                        Performance has regressed.
Found 4 outliers among 100 measurements (4.00%)
  4 (4.00%) high mild

bench_process_compute_budget_instructions_mixed/355 mixed instructions
                        time:   [2.5596 ms 2.5616 ms 2.5636 ms]
                        thrpt:  [399.43 Kelem/s 399.74 Kelem/s 400.07 Kelem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [+97.026% +97.361% +97.712%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-49.421% -49.331% -49.245%]
                        Performance has regressed.
Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%)
  5 (5.00%) low mild

bench_process_compute_budget_instructions_mixed/355 mixed instructions #2
                        time:   [2.5537 ms 2.5560 ms 2.5583 ms]
                        thrpt:  [400.27 Kelem/s 400.63 Kelem/s 400.99 Kelem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [+96.982% +97.441% +97.904%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [-49.471% -49.352% -49.234%]
                        Performance has regressed.

`receive_and_buffer`

receive_and_buffer/sanitized_transaction_max_instructions
                        time:   [811.22 ms 811.58 ms 811.95 ms]
                        thrpt:  [20.179 Kelem/s 20.188 Kelem/s 20.197 Kelem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-2.3816% -2.2946% -2.2033%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+2.2529% +2.3485% +2.4397%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low mild

receive_and_buffer/sanitized_transaction_min_instructions
                        time:   [36.649 ms 36.689 ms 36.727 ms]
                        thrpt:  [446.11 Kelem/s 446.57 Kelem/s 447.05 Kelem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-0.7626% -0.6043% -0.4407%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+0.4427% +0.6079% +0.7684%]
                        Change within noise threshold.

Benchmarking receive_and_buffer/transaction_view_max_instructions: Warming up for 3.0000 s
Warning: Unable to complete 100 samples in 5.0s. You may wish to increase target time to 13.2s, or reduce sample count to 30.
receive_and_buffer/transaction_view_max_instructions
                        time:   [132.35 ms 132.83 ms 133.28 ms]
                        thrpt:  [122.93 Kelem/s 123.35 Kelem/s 123.80 Kelem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-3.9298% -3.5658% -3.2352%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+3.3434% +3.6976% +4.0905%]
                        Performance has improved.
Found 1 outliers among 100 measurements (1.00%)
  1 (1.00%) low mild

receive_and_buffer/transaction_view_min_instructions
                        time:   [18.972 ms 18.992 ms 19.013 ms]
                        thrpt:  [861.74 Kelem/s 862.67 Kelem/s 863.60 Kelem/s]
                 change:
                        time:   [-3.0307% -2.9104% -2.7770%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
                        thrpt:  [+2.8563% +2.9977% +3.1255%]
                        Performance has improved.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.9%. Comparing base (3bb500d) to head (7052789).
Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #5795     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    83.0%    82.9%   -0.1%     
=========================================
  Files         828      828             
  Lines      375829   375852     +23     
=========================================
- Hits       311965   311922     -43     
- Misses      63864    63930     +66     

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.