Skip to content

Conversation

@prabhusneha
Copy link
Contributor

Closes: #48833

@prabhusneha prabhusneha mentioned this pull request Apr 25, 2025
1 task
Copy link
Contributor

@amoghrajesh amoghrajesh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One comment, sounds fine by me. I do not have a very strong opinion whether it should be in cache.py under execution_time or some other name. I'm as long as its in the execution_time as we will import it with its short name anyways.
@kaxil WDYT?

@amoghrajesh amoghrajesh requested a review from Lee-W April 29, 2025 07:31
@amoghrajesh amoghrajesh changed the title Port SecretCache to Task SDK Port cache classes: SecretCache to Task SDK May 5, 2025
@amoghrajesh amoghrajesh requested a review from Lee-W May 5, 2025 06:51
@amoghrajesh
Copy link
Contributor

@Lee-W since this was a porting effort, I have dismissed your nits, i will follow it up dont worry :D

@amoghrajesh amoghrajesh merged commit ccde83c into apache:main May 5, 2025
70 checks passed
@amoghrajesh amoghrajesh deleted the port_secrets_cache_to_tasksdk branch May 5, 2025 07:59
mvfc pushed a commit to mvfc/airflow that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Port SecretCache to task sdk

3 participants