Skip to content

Conversation

@WillAyd
Copy link
Contributor

@WillAyd WillAyd commented Jul 1, 2024

One step towards #1950

Just doing microsecond support for now. Can add nanosecond support and time32 as a follow up

Reading was already implemented but untested. Added some shared test data to go with the writer

@WillAyd WillAyd requested a review from lidavidm as a code owner July 1, 2024 22:42
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the ADBC Libraries 14 milestone Jul 1, 2024
@WillAyd WillAyd changed the title Read/write support for TIME64 with usec precision feat(c/driver/postgresql): Read/write support for TIME64 with usec precision Jul 1, 2024
@WillAyd WillAyd changed the title feat(c/driver/postgresql): Read/write support for TIME64 with usec precision feat(c/driver/postgresql): Read/write support for TIME64[us] Jul 1, 2024
@WillAyd WillAyd force-pushed the pg-time-support branch from f68383d to fe7456b Compare July 1, 2024 22:49
adbc_validation::Handle<struct ArrowArray> array;
struct ArrowError na_error;

const enum ArrowTimeUnit unit = NANOARROW_TIME_UNIT_MICRO;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hard coded for now, but when we add nano support this will be parametrized (we have the same pattern for timestamp tests)

*out = std::make_unique<PostgresCopyNetworkEndianFieldWriter<int64_t>>();
return NANOARROW_OK;
default:
return ADBC_STATUS_INVALID_STATE;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: maybe NOT_IMPLEMENTED?

@lidavidm lidavidm merged commit b7cdb40 into apache:main Jul 3, 2024
@WillAyd WillAyd deleted the pg-time-support branch July 3, 2024 00:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants