Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(csharp): improve handling of StructArrays #2587
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat(csharp): improve handling of StructArrays #2587
Changes from 3 commits
dbe146f
eeab743
df1562d
a70b800
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How can we get here? Why is this not an error, and why does it impact only StringArray and not other arrays?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This gives up some of the performance benefit of the approach. Instead of having to add a check to each invocation, can we have the caller tell us in advance what the expected source type is and return one of two different delegates?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I couldnt figure out an elegant way to have two separate delegates so I went with one and checking the DataType of the array that's passed in.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To make up for the internal contract change of allowing null on ReadChunk, only pass valid readers (that aren't null) to the MultiArrowReader. If it is empty, then no errors occur.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This changes the internal contract slightly because ReadChunk can now result in a null if the stream doesn't have any rows.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A NullReferenceException occurs if there are no results from the query because response.Current is null. So, this uses an indicator of "HasRows" to dictate the behavior of it.