GH-48869: [Doc] Add runs-on to Continuous Integration Sponsors on README #48881
+7
−3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
github-actions
bot
added
Component: Documentation
awaiting committer review
Member
Author
|
I've taken inspiration from: Should we add AWS too? @rok |
rok
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2026
Member
rok
left a comment
rok
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Adding AWS sounds like a good idea yeah!
github-actions
bot
added
awaiting merge
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
We have added runs-on as a solution for our cuda runners. As part of their nonprofit license, which we are using, we should add a working hyperlink and a shout-out to our documentation or our README.
What changes are included in this PR?
Continuous Integration Sponsorson README with link to runs-on.Are these changes tested?
No
Are there any user-facing changes?
No