Skip to content

More eagerly merge compatible environments. #34583

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 9, 2025

Conversation

robertwb
Copy link
Contributor

@robertwb robertwb commented Apr 8, 2025

Specifically, merge environments that are identical except for their dependencies, but where one environment's dependencies are a superset of the others.

This will reduce the number of distinct environments of the same type, and the associated materialization costs of moving between them.

Ideally this would be done in a runner for environments that are already co-located on the same worker, but that is a further optimization.


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

Specifically, merge environments that are identical except for their
dependencies, but where one environment's dependencies are a superset
of the others.

This will reduce the number of distinct environments of the same
type, and the associated materialization costs of moving between
them.

Ideally this would be done in a runner for environments that are
already co-located on the same worker, but that is a further
optimization.
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

As well as being very different from the low-level execution details
found in common.py, there is no need to compile these (whereas the
other structures in common.py are critical to optimize for elementwise
efficiency).
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @claudevdm for label python.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmpdir:

def make_file(basename, content):
subdir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(dir=tmpdir, delete=False).name
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a test is failing because of delete=False. Maybe use tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile?

def make_file(basename, content):
>     subdir = tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(dir=tmpdir, delete=False).name
E     TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'delete'

@robertwb robertwb merged commit 78071e2 into apache:master Apr 9, 2025
88 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants