[CELEBORN-1917][FOLLOWUP] Do not wait if total inflight or inflight to a specific worker is lower than threshold#3386
Closed
turboFei wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
[CELEBORN-1917][FOLLOWUP] Do not wait if total inflight or inflight to a specific worker is lower than threshold#3386turboFei wants to merge 1 commit into
turboFei wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Member
Author
Contributor
|
Using || could lead to global byte limit violations or single worker overload. |
mridulm
requested changes
Jul 24, 2025
mridulm
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually, @DDDominik is right - I got the logic wrong.
What exists is correct - we dont need this: thanks for the follow up @turboFei - we can close this; apologies for the bother !
Member
Author
ok, closed |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
If
maxInFlightBytesSizeEnabled, break thelimitMaxInFlightwaiting if total inflight or inflight to a specific worker is lower than threshold.Why are the changes needed?
Followup for comment #3248 (comment) incase we miss it.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Code review.