-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
[Draft] server: do not allocate nic on public network for NSX VPC VR #10081
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
weizhouapache
wants to merge
1
commit into
apache:4.20
Choose a base branch
from
weizhouapache:4.20-do-not-allocate-public-nic-nsx-vr
base: 4.20
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how about
StaticNat
(and maybe others)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good question
To be honest, I never tested the case that SourceNat and StaticNat are provided by different providers (e.g. Nsx for Source NAT and VPCVirtualRouter for Static NAT). I do not think it will work.
this PR is aligned with the 4.19 code
cloudstack/server/src/main/java/com/cloud/network/vpc/VpcManagerImpl.java
Lines 3115 to 3119 in f9b1767
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok, might work. As you create a method
isSrcNatIpRequiredForVpcVr
the contents seems appropriate, but its use is more likeneedsPublicInterface
does it? and in that case we would also want to test if the VR needs to provideStaticNat
. I think aGateway
could be on a static ip as well, in theory at least.maybe rename the method?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for isolated networks (NATTED mode by default), it uses VR as SourceNat
for Routed networks, it uses VR as Gateway
in both cases, the VR needs a public IP (as Source NAT or Gateway)
For Static NAT, I think we do not need to add a public interface to the VR when VR is created.
when Static NAT is enabled, it may add a public interface if needed