Smoke tests: Xenserver - Fix consistent failure noticed on scale VM test

[Pearl1594]

Description

This PR fixes consistent failure noticed on the test_scale_vm.py test suite:
#10668 (comment)

Using the centos template as the Macchinina template registered with "Other Linux (64-bit)" does not have guest_os_details for min and max dynamic memory to be used during scaling by xenserver. Which results in failure of the test as it fails to meet the constraints of

0 <= memory-static-min(512MB) <= memory-dynamic-min(1024MB) <= memory-dynamic-max(1024MV) <= memory-static-max(512MB)

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI
• test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[Pearl1594]

@blueorangutan package

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.02%. Comparing base (207a2c1) to head (edf7659).

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.20   #10741      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     16.02%   16.02%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity    13124    13123       -1     
============================================
  Files          5652     5652              
  Lines        495921   495921              
  Branches      60053    60053              
============================================
- Hits          79463    79452      -11     
- Misses       407593   407606      +13     
+ Partials       8865     8863       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests	16.86% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan package

[weizhouapache]

good finding @Pearl1594

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[Pearl1594]

I still think there is an underlying issue / behavioural change. Because this seems to have been working until 4.19 - this specific test fails from 4.20

[weizhouapache]

I still think there is an underlying issue / behavioural change. Because this seems to have been working until 4.19 - this specific test fails from 4.20

ah ok, so some changes in 4.20 causes it ?

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13092

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland [SL] unsupported parameters provided. Supported mgmt server os are: ol8, ol9, debian12, rocky8, alma9, suse15, centos7, centos6, alma8, ubuntu18, ubuntu22, ubuntu20, ubuntu24. Supported hypervisors are: kvm-centos6, kvm-centos7, kvm-rocky8, kvm-ol8, kvm-ol9, kvm-alma8, kvm-alma9, kvm-ubuntu18, kvm-ubuntu20, kvm-ubuntu22, kvm-ubuntu24, kvm-debian12, kvm-suse15, vmware-55u3, vmware-60u2, vmware-65u2, vmware-67u3, vmware-70u1, vmware-70u2, vmware-70u3, vmware-80, vmware-80u1, vmware-80u2, vmware-80u3, xenserver-65sp1, xenserver-71, xenserver-74, xenserver-84, xcpng74, xcpng76, xcpng80, xcpng81, xcpng82, xcpng83

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan test ol8 xenserver-74

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + xenserver-74) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-13039)

[DaanHoogland]

@blueorangutan test ol8 xenserver-84

[blueorangutan]

@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + xenserver-84) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-13044)

[Pearl1594]

@blueorangutan test ol8 xcpng76

[blueorangutan]

@Pearl1594 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + xcpng76) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[Pearl1594]

@blueorangutan test ol8 xcpng82

[blueorangutan]

@Pearl1594 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + xcpng82) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-13062)

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-13061)