test: fix several simulator CI failures

[weizhouapache]

Description

This PR fixes lots of CI failures like

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• build/CI
• test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[weizhouapache]

this is caused by #10799

However, there is no CI failures with 4.19, but there are lots of failures with 4.20

cc @slavkap

[weizhouapache]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 16.14%. Comparing base (badf3e1) to head (09694a5).
Report is 2 commits behind head on 4.20.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...n/java/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               4.20   #10890   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     16.14%   16.14%           
  Complexity    13240    13240           
=========================================
  Files          5656     5656           
  Lines        497578   497579    +1     
  Branches      60332    60333    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits          80310    80312    +2     
- Misses       408317   408318    +1     
+ Partials       8951     8949    -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	4.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests	16.99% <0.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13449

[weizhouapache]

oh, sorry, the issue is dataStoreProviderManager is NULL, not storeprovider

I will update the PR

[weizhouapache]

PR is updated
seems like an issue with merge forward

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[slavkap]

code LGMT
Sorry, @weizhouapache, for this bug. First, I made the changes on the main branch, and my tests were successful. I haven't thought that there could be an option for the driver or the provider to be null at this point

[weizhouapache]

code LGMT Sorry, @weizhouapache, for this bug. First, I made the changes on the main branch, and my tests were successful. I haven't thought that there could be an option for the driver or the provider to be null at this point

@slavkap
no worries, your code is fine.
it is because of missing @Inject in the merge forward

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 13450

[weizhouapache]

I am merging , as this fixes a blocker issue
If there are other issues, let 's address afterwards