Skip to content

[Improve] add thrfit max message size option#593

Merged
CalvinKirs merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
JNSimba:add_thrift_message_size_option
May 9, 2025
Merged

[Improve] add thrfit max message size option#593
CalvinKirs merged 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
JNSimba:add_thrift_message_size_option

Conversation

@JNSimba
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@JNSimba JNSimba commented May 8, 2025

Proposed changes

Caused by: org.apache.doris.shaded.org.apache.thrift.transport.TTransportException: MaxMessageSize reached
    at org.apache.doris.shaded.org.apache.thrift.transport.TEndpointTransport.checkReadBytesAvailable(TEndpointTransport.java:81)
    at org.apache.doris.shaded.org.apache.thrift.protocol.TBinaryProtocol.checkStringReadLength(TBinaryProtocol.java:444)
    at org.apache.doris.shaded.org.apache.thrift.protocol.TBinaryProtocol.readStringBody(TBinaryProtocol.java:415)
    at org.apache.doris.shaded.org.apache.thrift.protocol.TBinaryProtocol.readMessageBegin(TBinaryProtocol.java:256)
    at org.apache.doris.shaded.org.apache.thrift.TServiceClient.receiveBase(TServiceClient.java:77)
    at org.apache.doris.sdk.thrift.TDorisExternalService$Client.recvGetNext(TDorisExternalService.java:92)
    at org.apache.doris.sdk.thrift.TDorisExternalService$Client.getNext(TDorisExternalService.java:79)
    at org.apache.doris.flink.backend.BackendClient.getNext(BackendClient.java:185)
    ... 10 more 

Checklist(Required)

  1. Does it affect the original behavior: (Yes/No/I Don't know)
  2. Has unit tests been added: (Yes/No/No Need)
  3. Has document been added or modified: (Yes/No/No Need)
  4. Does it need to update dependencies: (Yes/No)
  5. Are there any changes that cannot be rolled back: (Yes/No)

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@CalvinKirs CalvinKirs merged commit b8b7d6c into apache:master May 9, 2025
6 checks passed
@JNSimba JNSimba mentioned this pull request Feb 28, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants