Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Improvement](local exchange) Reuse memory in PassToOneExchanger #48745

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 10, 2025

Conversation

Gabriel39
Copy link
Contributor

@Gabriel39 Gabriel39 commented Mar 6, 2025

What problem does this PR solve?

pick #39031

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Mar 6, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@Gabriel39
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 0.00% (0/13) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 36.87% (9712/26339)
Line Coverage 28.56% (81066/283826)
Region Coverage 27.14% (41508/152915)
Branch Coverage 23.88% (21066/88202)

@Gabriel39
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@Gabriel39
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 0.00% (0/27) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 37.09% (9770/26338)
Line Coverage 28.76% (81641/283842)
Region Coverage 27.32% (41776/152929)
Branch Coverage 24.03% (21201/88218)

@Gabriel39
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 0.00% (0/27) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 37.09% (9771/26344)
Line Coverage 28.76% (81645/283884)
Region Coverage 27.31% (41777/152955)
Branch Coverage 24.03% (21198/88228)

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 22f1cd1 into apache:branch-2.1 Mar 10, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants