Skip to content

[FLINK-37682]: Upgrade Jackson Lib to Address CVE-2023-35116 #972

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

atu-sharm
Copy link

What is the purpose of the change

Flink Kuberenetes Operator uses jackson with 2.15.0 and has CVE-2023-35116:

CVE-2023-35116: jackson-databind package versions before 2.15.2 are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS)
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2023-35116

Brief change log

Upgraded Jackson to 2.16.0

Verifying this change

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (100MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after master (JobManager) failure
  • Manually verified the change by running a 4 node cluster with 2 JobManagers and 4 TaskManagers, a stateful streaming program, and killing one JobManager and two TaskManagers during the execution, verifying that recovery happens correctly.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changes to the CustomResourceDescriptors: (yes / no)
  • Core observer or reconciler logic that is regularly executed: (yes / no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant