Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

YARN-11788. Remove unused unit tests. #7476

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

slfan1989
Copy link
Contributor

@slfan1989 slfan1989 commented Mar 6, 2025

Description of PR

JIRA: YARN-11788 - Remove unused unit tests.

While upgrading the unit tests for ResourceManager, I found that some of the test cases only contained comments and were not serving any practical purpose. Therefore, I decided to remove these unused unit tests.

How was this patch tested?

For code changes:

  • Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
  • Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE, LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary files?

@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 32s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚 test4tests 0m 0s The patch appears to include 4 new or modified test files.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 35m 22s trunk passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 59s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.26+4-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 compile 0m 52s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 55s trunk passed
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 58s trunk passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 56s trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.26+4-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 47s trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 53s trunk passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 34m 39s branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 0m 48s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 53s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.26+4-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javac 0m 53s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 46s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
+1 💚 javac 0m 46s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 1s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 42s hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager: The patch generated 0 new + 0 unchanged - 8 fixed = 0 total (was 8)
+1 💚 mvnsite 0m 48s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 43s the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.26+4-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 40s the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
+1 💚 spotbugs 1m 52s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedclient 34m 38s patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 109m 18s hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager in the patch passed.
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 36s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
229m 32s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.48 ServerAPI=1.48 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7476/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #7476
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname Linux 148a69b67bb7 5.15.0-126-generic #136-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 6 10:38:22 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / fad4b3e
Default Java Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
Multi-JDK versions /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.26+4-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_442-8u442-b06us1-0ubuntu120.04-b06
Test Results https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7476/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 951 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager U: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager
Console output https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-7476/1/console
versions git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@slfan1989
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cnauroth @ayushtkn Could you please review this PR? Thank you very much! I believe we can remove these classes as their code has been completely commented out, and they haven't been used for at least five years. It seems unlikely that we'll be re-enabling these unit tests.

@slfan1989 slfan1989 changed the title YARN-11788 - Remove unused unit tests. YARN-11788. Remove unused unit tests. Mar 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@cnauroth cnauroth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a really interesting finding. It looks like the tests were commented out in YARN-7243 as part of slf4j migration. I couldn't find any discussion of why they were commented out or if there was ever any intention to re-enable them later.

@PrabhuJoseph , you contributed YARN-7243. Do you remember any details on this?

@slfan1989
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is a really interesting finding. It looks like the tests were commented out in YARN-7243 as part of slf4j migration. I couldn't find any discussion of why they were commented out or if there was ever any intention to re-enable them later.

@PrabhuJoseph , you contributed YARN-7243. Do you remember any details on this?

@cnauroth Thanks for the information! I will skip these classes when upgrading RM unit tests to Junit5.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants