HADOOP-19762: Move hadoop-gcp from hadoop-tools to hadoop-cloud-storage-project #8147
+3
−3
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
When we introduced hadoop-gcp, we discussed whether this belongs under hadoop-cloud-storage-project or hadoop-tools in a comment chain starting here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19343?focusedCommentId=17941734&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17941734
We chose hadoop-tools, but in retrospect, hadoop-cloud-storage-project is really the right choice. hadoop-aws and hadoop-azure remain under hadoop-tools mostly for legacy reasons. Moving them under hadoop-cloud-storage-project would cause a lot of maintenance burden while backporting patches to prior versions. For a new, unreleased cloud
FileSystem, we have the opportunity to ship it in hadoop-cloud-storage-project from the start.git mv hadoop-tools/hadoop-gcp hadoop-cloud-storage-projectmaven-dependency-plugin:listis called for shell profile generation.How was this patch tested?
For code changes:
LICENSE,LICENSE-binary,NOTICE-binaryfiles?