fix(github): auto-enrich missing URL fields in GitHub scopes #8661
+47
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add automatic URL enrichment to PutScopes function to fetch missing htmlUrl and cloneUrl fields from GitHub API when only fullName is provided. This ensures gitextractor has the required URLs for cloning repositories. - Fetch repo details from GitHub API when URLs are missing - Populate htmlUrl and cloneUrl from API response - Add graceful error handling for inaccessible repos
dosubot
bot
added
size:M
cedriclecoz
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add automatic URL enrichment to PutScopes function to fetch missing htmlUrl and cloneUrl fields from GitHub API when only fullName is provided. This ensures gitextractor has the required URLs for cloning repositories.
pr-type/bug-fix,pr-type/feature-development, etc.Summary
What does this PR do?
Does this close any open issues?
Closes #8640