OAK-11415: TypeEditor: constraint exception for node type violations should contain that node's effective type#2009
Merged
Conversation
…should contain that node's effective type
Commit-Check ✔️ |
mbaedke
approved these changes
Jan 21, 2025
rombert
reviewed
Jan 21, 2025
Contributor
rombert
left a comment
rombert
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be useful IMO to also surface the node's path, if available. I noticed this exception as part of a FileVault content package install and it's not easy to understand which node definition caused this.
Contributor
Author
I agree, but the path does not seem to be available here. |
|
andreeastroe96
pushed a commit
to andreeastroe96/jackrabbit-oak
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2025
…should contain that node's effective type (apache#2009)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.