-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 567
Improved: getConfigParam can't be configured at runtime (OFBIZ-12815) #634
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
thahn27
wants to merge
1
commit into
apache:trunk
from
ecomify:OFBIZ-12815_getConfigParam_in_InterfaceConfig_cannot_be_configured_during_runtime
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello, since it is for trunk and java 17 is available, what do you think about using switch pattern matching (and Guarded Pattern)
ref : https://openjdk.org/jeps/406
Thanks and regards,
Gil
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mmm, i got carried away discovering those new switch syntax :), simple switch are sufficient here, sorry.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey Gil,
i closed this PR and opened another one because the commit description was wrong. The new PR: #635
Also i will adjust the existing code with a switch in an upcoming commit in the new PR.
Thanks and regards,
Tobias
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks to you Tobias :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @gilPts ,
i tried to implement the switch statement instead of the if statements and i can't really make it work. The pattern matching documentation in the ref you provided works with objects which have been instantiated before. Maybe stick to the if statements?
Maybe you could provide an example or explain how you would implement such switch statement.
Thanks and regards,
Tobias
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes pattern matching is not applicable here, hence my second comment, sorry for the misunderstanding. If in those cases are fine, since we are operating on
Class
object test...Thanks