Support parsing Doris CREATE TABLE multi range partition and per-partition properties syntax#39201
Open
ealeonraz wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Support parsing Doris CREATE TABLE multi range partition and per-partition properties syntax#39201ealeonraz wants to merge 1 commit into
ealeonraz wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ition properties syntax
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #31495.
Changes proposed in this pull request:
FROM (...) TO (...) INTERVAL n [unit](date/hour/integer variants), reusing the same shape as the existingALTER TABLE ... ADD PARTITIONSrulePARTITION p VALUES [(...), (...))in CREATE TABLE, mirroring the existingdorisPartitionDescrule used by ALTER TABLEPARTITION p1 VALUES LESS THAN ('2022-01-01') ('storage_policy' = '...', 'replication_num'='1'), reusing the existingpropertiesruleInternalDorisParserITpasses (1261 tests, 0 failures)Notes on the issue's SQL case list: the
example_db.table_hashcase already parses on current master (no change needed, so no assert added per the issue guidance); the scraped fragments (CREATE, TABLE, array-function signatures,STRING) are not valid standalone statements and were ignored per the issue guidance.Before committing this PR, I'm sure that I have checked the following options:
./mvnw clean install -B -T1C -Dmaven.javadoc.skip -Dmaven.jacoco.skip -e.