Repository navigation
[SPARK-60087] Add Kueue feature support table to spark_custom_resources.md - #960
Closed
dongjoon-hyun wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
dongjoon-hyun wants to merge 1 commit into
dongjoon-hyun wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
peter-toth
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2026
Member
Author
|
Thank you always, @peter-toth ! |
Member
Author
|
Merged to main |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to add a table to the
Kueuesection ofdocs/spark_custom_resources.mdthat summarizes which Kueue features are supported. The existing items of the section are unchanged. The table also covers partial admission, Topology Aware Scheduling, MultiKueue and elastic workloads, which the docs did not mention before. None of them are supported.Why are the changes needed?
The section has 22 prose items and no table, so readers cannot see at a glance how much of Kueue the integration supports.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. This is a documentation-only change.
How was this patch tested?
Manual review against the code.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
Generated-by: Claude Opus 5.5